Balfour v. Balfour (1919) Case: Citation, Facts, Judgment & Significance

Balfour v. Balfour (1919) is a landmark case in contract law, decided by the Court of Appeal in England. Although it is an English case, its principle

Balfour v. Balfour (1919)

Balfour v. Balfour (1919) is a landmark case in contract law, decided by the Court of Appeal in England. Although it is an English case, its principles have been influential in many common law jurisdictions, including India, particularly regarding the intention to create legal relations in the formation of contracts.

Parties Involved

• Mr. Arthur Balfour: The defendant, a civil servant working in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka).
• Mrs. Balfour: The plaintiff, who was married to Mr. Balfour.

Court : Court of Appeal (Civil Division), England

Full case name : Balfour v Balfour

Decided on : 25 June 1919

Balfour v. Balfour Case Citation(s) : [1919] 2 KB 571

Legislation cited : Married Women's Property Act 1882

Balfour v. Balfour Case Background/Facts

Mr. and Mrs. Balfour, a couple from Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), traveled to England for a vacation in 1915. Unfortunately, Mrs. Balfour became ill during the trip and required urgent medical care. Consequently, they agreed that Mr. Balfour would return to Ceylon for work, while Mrs. Balfour would remain in England until she recovered. It was also agreed that Mr. Balfour would send her 30 pounds monthly for maintenance during this period, until she was well enough to return to Ceylon. 

This arrangement was made when their relationship was still harmonious, without any issues. However, over time, their relationship soured, leading to Mr. Balfour's cessation of maintenance payments. Mrs. Balfour then decided to enforce the agreement legally and took the matter to court. Mr. Balfour later proposed making their separation official through a letter to his wife. Eventually, they legally separated, meaning they got divorced. Mrs. Balfour initiated legal action against Mr. Balfour in 1918 for the unpaid maintenance he had agreed to provide.

Issues Raised In The Case Balfour v. Balfour 

1. Did Mr. Balfour have any intention to form an agreement with his wife, Mrs. Balfour?
2. Is the agreement between Mr. and Mrs. Balfour valid in any respect?
3. Is the contract between a husband and wife enforceable in a court of law?

Balfour v. Balfour Case Judgment

In simpler language, the Court of Appeal found that there was no legally enforceable contract between Mr. and Mrs. Balfour. The judges all agreed on this outcome, but they explained their reasoning in different ways.

Warrington LJ thought it would be ridiculous to consider everyday promises between a husband and wife as legally binding contracts. He believed that while the husband did promise to pay his wife a certain amount, and he should honor that promise as a matter of personal integrity, there was never an intention to create a legally enforceable agreement.

Duke LJ focused on the fact that there was no separation agreement between the couple, which could have made promises between them legally binding. Since they were still married and not officially separated, the usual legal rules that might apply to agreements between other types of parties did not apply here.

Lord Justice Atkin emphasized that agreements between spouses, such as the one in question, usually do not intend to have legal consequences. He argued that it would be harmful to allow such personal promises to be enforced in court because it could lead to endless litigation over minor domestic matters. Atkin LJ believed that the nature of marriage involves many informal agreements based on mutual love and support, not legal obligation.

Overall, the court's decision was based on the view that the promise made by Mr. Balfour to his wife was part of their ordinary marital relationship and not meant to create a contract that could be enforced in court. The judges thought it would be a bad idea to treat such personal promises as legal contracts because it could lead to numerous legal disputes over everyday matters between spouses.

Significance

The decision in Balfour v. Balfour became a seminal case in contract law, particularly concerning the requirement for an intention to create legal relations in order for an agreement to be considered a binding contract. It established a general presumption against the enforceability of domestic agreements in court, influencing subsequent case law and legal understanding in matters of contract formation within domestic contexts.

Balfour v. Balfour Case PDF Download