Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case (2010): Background, Arguments & Judgment


The case of Selvi vs State of Karnataka (2010) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India, which significantly impacted the legal landscape regarding the admissibility of certain types of evidence in court and the rights of accused persons under the Indian Constitution. This case specifically addressed the use of narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain electrical activation profile (BEAP) tests, often referred to collectively as "lie detector tests," and their implications for the rights guaranteed under Articles 20(3) and 21 of the Indian Constitution.

The backdrop of this case involves various instances where investigative agencies in India started relying on these scientific tests to gather evidence from suspects, witnesses, or accused persons in criminal cases. These methods were seen as a way to elicit information that the subjects might not voluntarily disclose. The use of such tests raised several legal and ethical questions, primarily concerning the constitutional rights of individuals.

Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case (2010): Background, Arguments & Judgment

Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case Background & Legal Challenges

Several petitions were filed before the Supreme Court challenging the use of these forensic techniques in criminal investigations without the consent of the individuals. The petitioners argued that these practices were unconstitutional and sought a legal determination on their validity.

The Selvi vs State of Karnataka case presented several legal challenges that required careful examination by the Supreme Court of India. The core issues revolved around constitutional law, the rights of individuals under investigation, and the evolving nature of forensic science in criminal investigations. 

1. Right Against Self-Incrimination

A fundamental legal challenge was the interpretation of Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution, which states that no person accused of any offense shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves. The court had to determine whether the involuntary administration of narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain mapping constituted a violation of this right, considering these methods could lead to self-incriminatory responses without direct questioning.

2. Right to Privacy

The case also raised questions about the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The involuntary use of forensic tests was argued to be an intrusion into the mental privacy of individuals, forcing them to expose their thoughts and memories without consent.

The core issue was whether compelling a person to undergo narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and BEAP tests infringes upon the constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 20(3) - the right against self-incrimination, and Article 21 - the right to privacy and personal liberty.

3. Legal Status and Admissibility of Scientific Tests

Another challenge was evaluating the scientific validity and reliability of narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain mapping as investigative tools. The court had to consider whether evidence obtained through these methods should be admissible in court, especially when administered without the consent of the individual.

4. Ethical Considerations and Human Dignity

The case highlighted ethical concerns regarding the treatment of individuals subjected to these investigative techniques. It raised questions about the balance between the need for effective law enforcement and the protection of individual rights and dignity.

5. Informed Consent and Voluntariness

Determining the nature and extent of consent required for these tests was a significant legal challenge. The court had to establish guidelines to ensure that any consent given was informed, voluntary, and not the result of coercion or undue influence, keeping in mind the power dynamics between law enforcement and suspects or accused individuals.

The Supreme Court's judgment in Selvi vs State of Karnataka addressed these challenges by ruling that the involuntary administration of narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain mapping violates the Constitution. It emphasized the importance of informed consent, the right to privacy, and the right against self-incrimination. The case is a landmark decision in Indian jurisprudence, setting significant precedents regarding the ethical use of forensic science in criminal investigations and the protection of individual rights within the legal system.

What is Narco-Analysis, Polygraph Tests, and Brain Mapping?

Narco-Analysis, Polygraph Tests, and Brain Mapping are forensic tools used in the investigation process to gather information from suspects or individuals involved in a criminal case. Each of these techniques attempts to uncover truths or lies by bypassing the individuals' conscious control and is based on the premise that it is harder for people to control their subconscious responses. Here's a brief overview of each:


Narco-analysis involves the injection of a sedative drug (such as sodium pentothal) into a person, which induces a state of reduced consciousness. In this state, the person is believed to be more likely to divulge true information, as the inhibition-lowering effect of the drug makes it difficult for them to lie. The subject's responses are recorded and later analyzed. Critics argue about the ethical implications and reliability of the information obtained through narco-analysis, as the induced state may lead to the mixing of fantasies or imagination with real memories.

Polygraph Tests

A polygraph test, commonly known as a lie detector test, measures and records several physiological indices such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while the subject is asked and answers a series of questions. The premise is that deceptive answers will produce physiological responses that can be differentiated from those associated with non-deceptive answers. However, the accuracy of polygraph tests is debated, as factors like nervousness, fear, and anxiety can influence the results, and some individuals may be able to control their physiological responses, thereby "beating" the test.

Brain Mapping

Brain Mapping, or Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP), involves the use of electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the electrical activity in the brain. In the context of criminal investigations, it's used to observe the brain's response to specific stimuli or questions related to the crime. The theory is that the brain will react differently when a person recognizes stimuli related to a crime they have witnessed or committed, compared to unfamiliar stimuli. However, like narco-analysis and polygraph tests, the interpretation of brain mapping results is subject to significant debate regarding its reliability and the potential for false positives or negatives.

Each of these methods raises significant ethical, legal, and scientific questions, particularly regarding consent, the potential for abuse, and the admissibility of evidence obtained through these means in court proceedings.

Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case (2010) Arguments

The Selvi vs. State of Karnataka (2010) case brought forth complex legal arguments that revolved around constitutional rights, the validity and ethicality of certain investigative procedures, and the protection of personal liberties. Here are the key arguments presented during the case:

Arguments Against the Use of Narco-Analysis, Polygraph Tests, and Brain Mapping:

Violation of Right Against Self-Incrimination: It was argued that forcing individuals to undergo narco-analysis, polygraph tests, or brain electrical activation profile (BEAP) tests without their consent constituted a violation of Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. This article protects individuals from being compelled to be witnesses against themselves.

Infringement of Right to Privacy: The petitioners contended that these tests infringed upon an individual's right to privacy, which is implicitly protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. Forcing individuals to reveal their thoughts and memories was seen as an invasion of their mental privacy.

Lack of Consent and Voluntariness: The use of these techniques without the explicit consent of the individuals was highlighted as problematic. Consent obtained under duress or within the confines of custody was argued not to be truly voluntary, compromising the ethical validity of these procedures.

Questionable Scientific Reliability: Doubts were raised about the scientific accuracy and reliability of the results obtained from narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain mapping. The argument was that the evidence procured through these means could be inherently unreliable and thus should not be admissible in court.

Potential for Abuse: Concerns were raised about the potential misuse of these techniques by law enforcement agencies, leading to abuse of power and violation of human rights.

Arguments in Favor of the Use of Narco-Analysis, Polygraph Tests, and Brain Mapping:

Tool for Effective Investigation: Proponents argued that these scientific techniques were necessary and effective tools for investigating complex cases, particularly when other evidences were hard to obtain.

Not Testimonial Compulsion: It was contended that the information derived from these tests did not amount to testimonial compulsion since the responses were induced through medical or scientific means rather than being directly elicited through interrogation.

Public Interest and National Security: The argument was also made that in the interest of public safety and national security, certain investigative liberties could be necessary to prevent and solve crimes.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of protecting individual rights, emphasizing the importance of consent, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to privacy. It held that evidence obtained from narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain mapping without consent is inadmissible in court, marking a significant judgment in the realm of criminal law and human rights.

Judgement in Selvi vs State of Karnataka (2010)

The Selvi vs. State of Karnataka case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of India in 2010, is a landmark judgment concerning the use of narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain electrical activation profile tests (often referred to as brain mapping) in investigations. The judgment was pivotal in addressing the legal and constitutional validity of these investigative techniques, particularly in light of the right to privacy, the right against self-incrimination, and the principles of fair investigation and trial.

Summary of the Judgment

The Supreme Court, in its comprehensive judgment, held that:

Right Against Self-Incrimination: The Court reaffirmed the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution, which states that no person accused of any offense shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves. The Court interpreted this provision broadly, to include not just oral or written statements but also the forcible administration of scientific techniques that extract information from the accused, thereby potentially incriminating them.

Involuntary Administration of Techniques: The Court declared that the involuntary administration of the narco-analysis test, polygraph test, and brain mapping constitutes an 'intrusive' method and a restraint on personal liberty and freedom, thus violating Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.

Voluntary Administration with Safeguards: The Court, however, did not completely prohibit the use of these scientific techniques. It held that if an individual voluntarily agrees to undergo any of these tests, they may be conducted, provided that certain safeguards are in place. These safeguards include the presence of a lawyer, a clear understanding of the physical, psychological, and legal implications of the test by the person subjected to it, and adherence to strict medical ethics.

Use of Evidence: Importantly, the Court also addressed how the information obtained through such tests can be used. It ruled that the results of these tests by themselves cannot be admitted as evidence unless they are corroborated by other material evidence. Moreover, any information or material discovered as a result of voluntary tests can be admitted in evidence, but the test results themselves, given their questionable reliability and potential for coercion, cannot be directly admitted as evidence to incriminate the accused.

Implications for Forensic Science and Criminal Investigations

Prior to this judgment, there was a growing interest in using scientific tests like narco-analysis, polygraph tests, and brain mapping as shortcuts to solve complex criminal cases. These methods were seen as effective tools to bypass the conventional but time-consuming investigative processes. However, the Supreme Court's ruling necessitated a reevaluation of these practices, emphasizing the importance of voluntariness and informed consent. It also pushed for the advancement and adoption of forensic sciences in a manner that respects constitutional mandates and ethical standards.

Ethical Considerations

The judgment highlighted ethical concerns associated with such investigative techniques. Administering tests like narco-analysis involves using drugs to lower a person's inhibitions, thereby making them susceptible to revealing information they would not divulge under normal circumstances. This raised serious questions about consent, the potential for harm, and the dignity of the individual being tested. By insisting on strict adherence to ethical guidelines and informed consent, the Supreme Court sought to ensure that the pursuit of justice does not trample upon the dignity and rights of individuals.

International Perspectives

The judgment also aligned India's stance on investigative techniques with international human rights standards. Various international covenants and declarations uphold the principles of bodily integrity, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to a fair trial. By setting limits on the use of scientific tests in investigations, the Supreme Court of India ensured that the country's legal framework respects global human rights norms.

Future of Criminal Investigations

Post the Selvi judgment, law enforcement agencies and investigative bodies are encouraged to develop their investigative skills and employ scientific methods that do not infringe on individuals' rights. This includes enhancing capabilities in areas such as DNA analysis, cyber forensics, and traditional detective work. The judgment implicitly promotes the advancement of forensic science and investigative techniques within the ethical and legal frameworks.

Legal and Judicial Training

The judgment has implications for legal and judicial training in India. It necessitates that law enforcement officials, lawyers, and judges are educated about the legal, ethical, and practical aspects of forensic science and investigative techniques. Understanding the nuances of such techniques, their legal admissibility, and ethical implications is crucial for the fair administration of justice.

Guidelines for the use of Polygraph Test (Lie Detector Test) on an Accused issued by the NHRC, must be strictly followed even for narcoanalysis and BEAP tests 

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India, recognizing the ethical and legal implications of conducting lie detector tests (polygraph tests), issued the "Guidelines for the Administration of Polygraph Test (Lie Detector Test) on an Accused" in 2000. These guidelines were established to ensure that the administration of such tests is carried out in a manner that respects the rights and dignity of the individual subjected to the test. While these guidelines specifically address polygraph tests, their principles are indeed relevant and have been suggested to be applicable, by extension, to other forensic psychological assessments such as narco-analysis and Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) tests, also known as brain mapping.

The guidelines emphasize voluntary participation, informed consent, and the right to legal representation, among other protections, to uphold the ethical standards and human rights of the individuals undergoing these tests. Here are some key points that are generally emphasized in such guidelines and that would be relevant to the administration of narco-analysis and BEAP tests as well:

Voluntary Participation and Informed Consent: The individual must consent to undergo the test, and this consent should be informed, meaning they are made fully aware of the nature, procedure, and implications of the test.

Legal Representation: The individual has the right to have a lawyer present during the procedure, and this right should be communicated to them before the test.

Medical and Psychological Suitability: Before the test, a thorough medical and psychological evaluation of the individual should be conducted to assess their fitness for undergoing the test. This is particularly pertinent in the case of narco-analysis, which involves the administration of drugs.

Recording of Proceedings: The entire process of the test, including the pre-test interview, the test itself, and the post-test interaction, should be audio-visually recorded to ensure transparency and accountability.

Use of Results: The results of such tests should be interpreted with caution, considering their scientific validity and the potential for errors. Moreover, these results cannot be considered as conclusive evidence but only as supportive information in the context of a broader investigation.

Protection of Human Rights: Throughout the process, the dignity and rights of the individual should be protected. The administration of the test should not cause physical harm or psychological distress beyond reasonable bounds.

Confidentiality: The results and information obtained from the test should be kept confidential and only disclosed to authorized personnel involved in the investigation.

These guidelines aim to balance the investigative needs of law enforcement with the protection of individual rights. Following the Supreme Court of India's judgment in Selvi vs. State of Karnataka (2010), these ethical and legal considerations have become even more critical, reinforcing that such tests cannot be administered without the explicit consent of the individual and that the results of such tests cannot be considered as standalone evidence in court.

Significance of the Judgment

The Selvi vs. State of Karnataka judgment is significant for several reasons:

It underscored the importance of personal autonomy, bodily integrity, and mental privacy, affirming these as core aspects of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.

It balanced the need for effective investigation and prosecution of crime with the fundamental rights of the accused, setting clear boundaries on how investigative agencies can use scientific techniques in their investigations.

It emphasized the importance of procedural safeguards to protect individuals subjected to these tests, highlighting the need for consent, legal counsel, and ethical conduct during such procedures.

By limiting the admissibility of evidence obtained through these tests, the judgment also sent a clear message about the need for investigative agencies to rely on more traditional and reliable methods of investigation, ensuring that the rights of the accused are not compromised.

The judgment in Selvi vs. State of Karnataka thus plays a crucial role in the intersection of law, privacy, and forensic science, shaping the contours of criminal procedure in India in alignment with constitutional guarantees and human rights standards.


The Selvi v. State of Karnataka case is a seminal judgment that underscores the balance between the need for effective investigation by the state and the protection of fundamental rights of individuals. It emphasizes the importance of voluntary participation in investigative processes that probe the mental state of an individual and sets a precedent for how evidence obtained from such processes is treated in the legal system. This judgment is a crucial reference point in discussions about forensic science, human rights, and the criminal justice system in India.

In conclusion, the Selvi vs. State of Karnataka (2010) case is a testament to the Indian judiciary's commitment to protecting constitutional rights while acknowledging the evolving nature of criminal investigations. It serves as a guidepost for balancing the quest for justice with the imperative to uphold human dignity and rights, making it a landmark case in the annals of Indian legal history.



10th Pass Govt Job,7,125 crpc,1,12th Paas Jobs,3,138 Ni Act,1,2024 National Lok Adalat Schedule,1,3 Years LL.B Colleges in West Bengal,1,3 Years LLB Course in India,1,3 Years LLB Course in Kalyani University,1,3 Years LLB Govt Colleges in India,1,3D Designer,1,4 year bed course,1,AAI Junior Executive Recruitment 2024,1,Acts,15,Admission,43,Agniveer,1,AIAPGET 2024,1,AIBE Exam,1,Aibe exam language,1,Aibe exam pattern,1,Aibe exam syllabus,1,Air Force Agniveer,1,aligarh muslim university case,1,aligarh muslim university issue,1,Aligarh Muslim University Minority Status Case,1,aligarh muslim university minority status case analysis,1,All Indian Government Exams after Graduation,1,amazon,1,Amazon Jobs,1,amazon seller,1,Amazon Work From Home Jobs For Freshers,1,Amex Law College,1,Amex Law College Fees,1,AP Ed CET 2024,1,AP PGCET 2024,1,AP PGECET 2024,1,APLAWCET/ APPGLCET 2024,1,application form for gun license,1,Apprentice,6,Are CV resume and bio data the same,1,Arms,1,Arms Act 1959,1,Arms Rules,1,Army Jobs,1,Article 21,1,Ashneer Grover Net Worth,1,Bail in bailable offences,1,Bail in non-bailable offences,1,Bailable and Non Bailable Offences,1,Balfour v Balfour Case,1,Bank Job Vacancy 2024,2,Bank Jobs,4,Bankura District Court Recruitment,1,Basic Structure Doctrine,1,BBMP Group D Jobs,1,BCECE 2024,1,Beautician Courses,1,Bed,1,Bed Admission,2,BEL Recruitment 2024,1,Best Formal Reply for Thank You,1,Best Reply For Thank You For Every Situation,1,Best Reply For Thank You To A Boy,1,Best Reply For Thank You To A Girl,1,Bharat Ratna to Lal Krishna Advani,1,BharatGPT Hanooman AI,1,Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023,3,Bihar Bed,2,Bihar Bed CET Syllabus,1,Bihar Bed Entrance Exam,1,Bihar Bed Exam,1,Bihar Bed Exam Pattern,1,Bihar Bed syllabus,2,Bihar ITI CAT 2024,1,bilkis bano,1,Bilkis Bano case,1,bilkis bano case convicts,1,bilkis bano case news,1,bilkis bano gujarat,1,bilkis bano news,1,bilkis bano supreme court,1,Bills,2,Binoda Law College,1,Binoda Law College admission fees,1,Binoda Law College admission process,1,Binoda Law College eligibility,1,Binoda Law College seats,1,BioAsia Summit 2024,1,Biography,4,Blog writer job,1,Blogging,1,BNS,1,BOI Officer Recruitment 2024,1,BPSC,1,BPSC Agriculture Department Various Post Recruitment 2024,1,BPSC School Head teacher recruitment 2024,1,Brainware University,1,Brainware University llb fees,1,BSPHCL Recruitment 2024,1,Burdwan University,1,Burdwan University 3 Years LL.B Admission,1,Business,3,business tips,1,business without money,1,Byjus Online teaching job,2,caa,1,Calcutta University,3,Calcutta University BA LL.B admission,1,Calcutta University BA LLb,1,Calcutta University BA LLb exam pattern,1,Calcutta University BA LLb syllabus,1,Calcutta University BA LLB Total Seats,1,Career,8,Career in Law,3,career tips,1,Carrer,2,Cases Related to UCC,1,cash earning sites,1,CBSE 10th Syllabus,1,Central Govt Jobs,8,Central Govt Schemes,1,CG SET Exam,1,CG SET Exam date,1,CG SET Syllabus,2,CGPEB Hostel Superintendent Recruitment 2024,1,Chandigarh TGT Recruitment 2024,1,Chapter 1,1,Citizenship,1,Citizenship Amendment Act,1,Civil judge job,1,CJI D Y Chandrachud,1,CJI DY Chandrachud Highlighted Four Issues in Legal Profession,1,CLAT 2025,1,CLW Act Apprentice Recruitment,1,CMAT 2024,1,Combined Medical Services,1,common interview questions,1,Composition and Functions of the Supreme Court of India,1,Composition of Lok Adalat,1,Content Writer,4,Content Writer Job,3,Content Writing Jobs,4,Copy Paste Jobs,2,Copy Paste Jobs Without Investment,1,Courses,6,Cover Letter,1,Cover Letter for Freshers,1,Crimes,1,CTET July 2024,1,CTET Syllabus 2024,1,CUET UG 2024,1,Current Affairs,9,Cyber Cell of Police,1,daily earning website,1,Data Analyst,1,Data Analyst Interview Questions,1,Data Analyst Job,1,Data Analyst Job Qualifications and Skills,1,Data Analyst Jobs,1,Data Analytics Course,1,Data Entry Jobs,5,Data Entry Operator,1,Data Protection and Data Privacy Laws in India,1,data protection laws,1,Defence Jobs,1,Delhi University,2,difference,1,difference between a CV and a bio,1,Difference between Advocate Lawyer,1,Difference Between CV Resume and Bio Data,1,Difference Between I.P.C and Cr.PC,1,Difference between Judgment Decree and Order,1,Differences Between Democracy and Republic,1,Digital Marketing Courses,1,Digital Marketing Jobs,1,distance university llb,1,download online stamp paper,1,DPDP Act,1,DRDO Apprentice 2024,1,dropshipping business,1,DSSSB Delhi District Court Jobs in Delhi,1,DU LL.B Entrance Exam,1,DU LLB Entrance Exam Pattern,1,DY Chandrachud,1,e Stamp Paper,1,e-Stamp Paper download,1,e-Stamp Paper registration,1,earn money,2,earn money online,12,Earning Websites,2,Education,26,Electoral bonds,2,Engineering Jobs,11,English,1,English Skill,15,Entry Level Digital Marketing Jobs,1,Event Planner,1,Exam Schedule of UPSC,1,Exams,2,Explained Law,1,Fali S Nariman Quotes for Law Students,1,Fali Sam Nariman,1,Farewell Speech,1,Farmers Protest 2024,1,Fee Structure for Symbiosis Law School,1,female freedom fighters of india,1,FIR Quashing,1,fir quashing cases,1,fir quashing fees,1,fir quashing format,1,fir quashing grounds,1,fir quashing process,1,fir quashing section,1,Free Online Courses,1,Free Online Courses With Certificates,1,freedom fighters,1,Freedom of speech,1,Freelance Jobs,1,Freelancing,1,Freelancing Sites,1,Fundamental Duties,1,Fundamental Rights of India,1,Gaganyaan Mission,1,Government Exams for Law Students,1,government law colleges,1,GPAT 2024,1,GPAT 2024 Exam Date,1,GPAT Exam Pattern,1,GPAT Syllabus,1,Graphic Designer Jobs,1,Gujarat Police Bharti 2024,1,Gujarat Police Bharti Constable Syllabus,1,gujarat riots bilkis bano,1,gun license,1,Gyanvapi case,1,Gyanvapi Mosque case,1,Habeas Corpus,1,Habeas Corpus case,1,Habeas Corpus Meaning,1,HAMA 1956,1,Handcuffing Case Laws,1,Handcuffing Judgments,1,Handcuffing Law in India,1,High Income Skills,1,High Income Skills without Degree,1,Hindi Blog,5,Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act 1956,1,Hindu Law,1,Hindu Law Notes,1,history,1,History of Indian Banks,1,History of UCC,1,How are you doing Reply,1,How are you doing reply formal,1,How are you doing responses,1,How Are You Reply,1,How Are You Reply To Boy,1,How Are You Reply To Friends,1,How Are You Reply To Girl,1,How Do You Do Reply,1,How do you do reply in chat to a girl,1,How Have You Been,1,How have you been answer,1,How have you been reply,1,how to,2,how to answer,1,How to become a Barrister in India,1,How to Become a Lawyer or Advocate,1,How to get a Gun License in India,1,How to improve legal drafting skills,1,how to introduce yourself in an interview,1,How To Introduce Yourself In English,1,How to Obtain Gun License In India,1,How To Procure A Gun In India,1,How to reply how are you doing,1,how to send legal notice,1,How To Start A Speech,1,How to write your skills on a Resume,1,How Was your Day Reply,1,HP LEET 2024,1,hp leet exam date,1,hp leet exam pattern,1,hp leet syllabus,1,HP PAT 2024,1,HPCL Engineering Professional 2024 Online Form,1,hr interview questions and answers,1,IB Recruitment 2024,1,IB Recruitment 2024 Eligibility,1,IB Recruitment 2024 Last date,1,IB Recruitment 2024 Vacancy,1,IGNOU,6,IGNOU Admission,1,IGNOU Assignment Front Page,1,IGNOU Assignment Status,1,IGNOU Distance MBA Admission,1,IGNOU Exam Form June 2024,1,IGNOU Exam Time Table June 2024,1,IGNOU Exams,1,IGNOU Front Page,1,IISER Admission Important Dates,1,IISER Application Form 2024,1,IISER Entrance Exam 2024 Syllabus,1,improve english,1,Income Tax,5,Income Tax Return,5,Income Tax Slabs,1,Indian Army Recruitment,1,Indian Constitution,10,Indian Contract Act,3,Indian Contract Act 1872,2,Indian Contract Act Section 6,1,Indian Laws,24,Indian Railway Jobs,1,Indian Stamp Bill 2023,1,indian women,1,Injunction,1,Injunction Act in India,1,International Womens day 2024,1,International Womens day Theme 2024,1,interview,1,Interview Questions and Answers,1,ipc 377,1,IT Act,1,ITI Jobs,7,ITR 1,1,ITR Filing Last Date,1,Jacob Elordi,1,Jacob Elordi faces allegations of alleged assault in Australia,1,Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Teacher Recruitment,1,JEE Main Syllabus,1,Jharkhand High Court Recruitment 2024,1,Jharkhand launches Widow Remarriage Incentive Scheme,1,JIPMAT 2024,1,JIS University,1,JIS University Law College,1,JIS University llb fees,1,Job interview,1,job interview questions and answers,1,Jobs in Bihar,4,Jobs in Chhattisgarh,1,Jobs in Gujarat,1,Jobs in Jharkhand,1,Jobs in Karnataka,1,Jobs in Kerala,1,Jobs in Madhya Pradesh,1,Jobs in Meghalaya,1,Jobs in Rajasthan,4,Jobs in Telangana,1,Jobs in Uttar Pradesh,2,Jobs in West Bengal,2,Join Indian Army,1,JRSET College of Law,1,jrset college of law admission,1,jrset college of law chakdaha nadia,1,jrset college of law contact no,1,jrset college of law courses,1,jrset college of law fees,1,Judgement on Electoral Bonds Scheme 2024,1,Judgments,10,Juice jacking,1,Jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India,1,Justice Indu Malhota,1,k8school,1,Kalyani University,1,KARTET 2024,1,KEAM 2024,1,kerala psc clerk,1,Kerala PSC Office Attendant,1,Kerala SET Exam,1,Kerala TET 2024,1,Kerala TET Exam,1,KPSC Group C Job,1,KPSC JE Recruitment,1,KPSC Recruitment 2024 Notification,1,KPSC Surveyor Recruitment 2024,1,KVS Admission 2024,1,Labour Law of India,2,Ladakh Protest,1,ladies freedom fighters of india,1,Lakhpati Didi Yojana,1,Lal Krishna Advani,1,Latest Government Jobs,76,Latest News,4,Latest Police Recruitment,1,Law Colleges,17,Law Notes,2,learn english,1,Legal Notice,1,Legitimacy To Child Born Outside Formal Marriage,1,Librarian Courses,1,List of bailable and non bailable offences,1,List of Chief Justice of India,1,List of the documents we should check before buying any land,1,LLB College in West Bengal,1,llb for distance university graduates,1,LLB Jobs,4,Lok Adalat,1,Lok Adalat 2024,1,Lok Adalat scheduled,1,mah cet,1,MAH CET 3 years llb entrance,1,MAH CET apply online,1,mah cet law,1,MAH CET Law Entrance Exam cut off,1,MAH CET Law Entrance Exam Eligibility,1,MAH CET Law Entrance Exam pattern,1,MAH CET Law Entrance Exam syllabus,1,MAH CET LLB 2024,1,Mahtari Vandana Yojanaa,1,make money,2,make money ideas,2,make money online,5,Maneka Gandhi v Union of India 1978,1,Maryam Nawaz Biography,1,Mast App,1,Mast App Download,1,MBA Jobs,1,Meaning of How Are You Doing,1,Medical courses,1,medical courses after 12th,1,Medical Courses Without NEET,1,Medical Exams,1,Meghalaya Police Recruitment 2024,1,MH CET 2024,1,MIES RM Law College 3 Years LLB Admission,1,MIES RM Law College eligibility,1,MIES RM Law College fees,1,MIES RM Law College review,1,Minimum Support Price MSP,1,Minimum Wages Act 1948,1,money earning sites,1,money earning websites,1,Most Common Reply For Thanks,1,Motivational Quotes,1,Motivational Quotes for Students,1,MPSET Exam 2024,1,MPSET Exam Syllabus and MPSET Exam Pattern,1,MrBeast,1,MSP Law,1,nalsa,1,National Science Day 2024,1,Nationalization of Banks in India,1,Naval Dockyard Mumbai Apprentice Online Form 2024,1,Navtej Singh Johar v UOI,1,NCET 2024,1,neet exam,1,NEET PG 2024,1,New Hit and Run Law,1,Non Bailable Warrant,1,NPCIL Executive Trainee Recruitment,1,NUHM Hooghly Recruitment 2024,1,NVS Recruitment 2024,1,Offences Relating to Marriage,1,OICL AO Recruitment 2024,1,One Nation One Election,1,Online Business in India,1,Online Coding Teacher,1,Online Complaint Procedure,1,Online Courses,1,Online Courses With Certificates,1,Online Data Entry Jobs From Home,3,online earning platform,1,Online Earning Websites,1,online job,1,online jobs,58,Online Jobs For Students,1,Online Jobs From Home,2,Online Jobs without Investment,1,Online Teacher Jobs,3,Online Teaching Job,2,Online Teaching Job at BYJUS,1,Online Teaching Jobs,12,online tutor,2,Online Typing Jobs,2,Online Typing Jobs from Home,2,OSSC CHSL Recruitment,1,Parliament,1,Part time jobs,11,Part Time Online Teaching Jobs From Home,2,Patanjali,1,Patna Law College,1,Patna Law College admission,1,Patna Law College eligibility,1,Patna Law College llb admission,1,Patna Law College llb exam pattern,1,Patna Law College llb syllabus,1,Patna University,1,Patna University academic calendar 2024,1,PCPNDT Act1994,1,Personal Freedom Social justice,1,personality development,1,Physics Wallah,1,PlanetSpark,1,PM Modi,1,PM Modi Yojnaa,2,PM Vishwakarma Yojana,1,Police Jobs,5,Pradhan Mantri Aawas Yojana,1,Prenuptial Agreement in India,1,preply,1,PREVENTION OF UNFAIR MEANS BILL 2024,1,Print e Stamp Paper Online,1,Privacy and Data Protection Law in India,1,Privacy Laws in India,1,Prohibition of Sex Selection,1,Proofreader Jobs,1,proofreading jobs,3,PSC,1,PSC Jobs,1,PSSSB JE Recruitment 2024 Apply Online,1,Pune,1,Punjab Police Recruitment 2024,1,pw,1,Question Papers,1,Quotes,1,Railway Apprentice 2024,1,Railway Group D Recruitment 2024,1,Railway jobs,7,Railway Recruitment 2024,1,Rajasthan APO Previous Year Paper,1,Rajasthan APO Salary 2024,1,Rajasthan APO Syllabus 2024,1,Rajasthan Civil Judge Recruitment,1,Rajasthan Pre DElEd Notification,1,Rajasthan PTET 2024,1,Rajasthan RPSC Public Relation Officer PRO Recruitment 2024,1,Rajasthan Safai Karamchari Recruitment 2024,1,Refer and Earn Apps,1,Register Cyber Crime Complaint,1,remote jobs,18,Right of Private Defence Under BNS 2023,1,Right to privacy,1,Right to privacy cases,1,Right to privacy gdpr,1,Right to privacy in india,1,Right to privacy law,1,Right To Property,1,RPF Constable Syllabus 2024,1,RPF SI Recruitment 2024,1,RPSC agriculture officer recruitment 2024,1,RPSC APO Vacancy 2024,1,RPSC PTI and Librarian Recruitment 2024,1,rrb alp,1,rrb alp 2024 job,1,rrb alp recruitment,1,RRB RPF Constable Recruitment 2024,1,RRB Technician Recruitment 2024,1,RRC Group D Recruitment,1,RSMSSB Junior Instructor Recruitment 2024,1,RSMSSB Rajasthan Stenographer Recruitment 2024,1,Salary,2,Sarkari Job,3,Sarkari Result,2,Sarkari Yojnaa,4,Sarsuna Law College,1,Sarsuna Law College courses,1,Sarsuna Law College fees,1,Sarsuna Law College location,1,Satish Ragde vs State of Maharashtra,1,Section 10 of Indian Contract Act explanation,1,Section 11 of Indian Contract Act,1,Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act,1,Section 2 of Indian Contact Act 1872,1,Section 6,1,sell online,1,Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case,1,SET Exams,1,Sexual Offence and Assault Against Woman and Child,1,Shabnam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh,1,Shyambazar Law College,1,Side Hustle Ideas,1,Simplilearn,1,SKAIL,1,Slat exam,1,Snehangshu Kanta Acharya Institute of Law fees,1,Snehangshu Kanta Acharya Institute of Law SKAIL,1,South East Central Railway Act Apprentice Recruitment,1,South East Central Railway Apprentice Online Form,1,South East Central Railway Trade Apprentice 2024 Online Form,1,spoken english,1,SSC,4,SSC CGL 2024,1,SSC CHSL 2024,1,SSC CHSL Syllabus and Exam Pattern,1,SSC CPO 2024,1,SSC JE 2024,1,SSC JE Salary 2024,1,SSC JE Syllabus and Exam Pattern,1,SSC Jobs,3,SSC Junior Engineer Recruitment 2024,1,SSC Selection Post 12 Recruitment,1,Stay Order,1,Stay order definition,1,Stay order time limit,1,Stay order vs Injunction,1,Step by Step Procedures to File a Cyber Crime Complaint,1,Sudha Murty Nominated To Rajya Sabha,1,Suo Moto,1,Suo Moto in Indian Law,1,Supreme Court,1,Supreme Court 75th Anniversary,1,Supreme Court Building Fund Allocation,1,Surendranath Law College,1,Surendranath Law College Admission,1,Surendranath Law College Fees,1,Surrogacy in India,1,Survey Sites,1,Syllabus,14,Symbiosis Law Admission Test 2024,1,Symbiosis Law Admission Test Eligibility,1,Symbiosis Law School,1,Take Care Reply,1,Tax,6,tcs career,1,tcs entru level jobs,1,TCS Jobs for Freshers,1,Teaching Jobs,14,Technology,1,Telangana High Court Recruitment,1,Telecom Bill 2023,1,Tell me about yourself,1,tell me about yourself answer,1,tell me about yourself examples,1,tell me about yourself interview,1,tell me about yourself sample answers,1,tell me something about yourself,1,Tezpur Government Law College,1,The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill 2023,1,The Kesavananda Bharti case,1,The Places of Worship act,1,The Places of Worship Special Provisions Act 1991,1,The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006,1,THE PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS BILL 2024,1,Tips of Legal Drafting,1,TN TRB Assistant Professor Recruitment 2024,1,TNPSC CCSE Recruitment,1,TNSET 2024,1,top 10,1,top 10 freedom fighters of india,1,Top 11 Law Colleges in India without CLAT,1,TS LAWCET 2024,1,ts lawcet exam date,1,Ts lawcet exam pattern,1,ts lawcet last date,1,ts lawcet syllabus,1,TS LPCET 2024,1,Types of bail,1,Types of ITR Forms,1,Types of Writs,1,Typing Jobs,3,UCC,1,ugc net,1,ugc net 2024,1,ugc net age limit,1,ugc net eligibility,1,UGC NET Exam,1,ugc net exam date,1,ugc net exam pattern,1,ugc net full form,1,ugc net syllabus,1,Unacademy,1,Uniform Civil Code,1,Uniform Civil Code in Goa,1,University,3,University Law College Utkal University,1,UP HJS Recruitment 2024,1,Upcoming Bank Jobs,1,Upcoming Railway Vacancy,1,UPMRC Recruitment 2024,1,UPPSC Agriculture Services,1,UPSC Calendar 2025,1,UPSC CMS 2024,1,UPSC CMS Exam Pattern,1,UPSC CMS Salary,1,UPSC CMS Syllabus,2,UPSC IES ISS 2024,1,UPSC IES ISS Syllabus,1,UPSC Jobs,2,UPSSSC JE Recruitment 2024,1,UPSSSC Junior Analyst Recruitment 2024,1,Uttarakhand Cooperative Bank Recruitment 2024,1,Uttarakhand UCC,1,Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code,1,Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Bill 2024,1,Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Bill,1,Vakalatnama,1,Vakalatnama Fees,1,Vakalatnama Format,1,Vakalatnama Rules,1,Vishnu Rambhhaji Harishchandre vs Bar Council Of India case,1,Void and Voidable Marriage in Hindu Law,1,Wapcos,1,WAPCOS Recruitment,1,Watch Video and Earn Money,1,WB JECA 2024,1,WB JECA Exam Date,1,WB JECA Registration,1,WB JECA Syllabus,1,WB Police Constable Recruitment 2024,2,WB police sub inspector recruitment 2024,1,West Bengal ITI,1,wfh,2,What do you do reply for college students,1,what is bilkis bano case,1,what is caa,1,What is freelancing,1,What is ITR,1,What is legal notice,1,Which ITR Should I File,1,Women Freedom Fighters of India,1,Women Reservation Bill,1,WordPress Developer,1,work from home,6,Work From Home Jobs,21,writer job,1,Writs,2,
item Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case (2010): Background, Arguments & Judgment
Selvi vs State of Karnataka Case (2010): Background, Arguments & Judgment
The case of Selvi vs State of Karnataka (2010) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India, which significantly impacted the legal landscape
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content