Section 114 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023: A Complete Guide to Understanding "Hurt" in Indian Criminal Law
If you have been following the
Section 114 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023: A Complete Guide to Understanding "Hurt" in Indian Criminal Law
If you have been following the legal landscape in India over the past couple of years, you already know that a major shift took place on July 1, 2024. The Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 — a law that had governed criminal justice in India for more than 160 years — was finally replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. Among the many sections that were renumbered and restructured, one of the most fundamental provisions is Section 114 of the BNS, which deals with the offence of "hurt." This might sound like a simple word, but in the world of criminal law, it carries deep legal meaning and serious consequences.
In this article, we will walk you through everything you need to know about Section 114 of the BNS — what it means, what it covers, how it is different from grievous hurt, what the punishment looks like, and how it compares with the old IPC. We will keep the language simple, avoid heavy legal jargon, and focus on practical understanding.
What is Section 114 of the BNS All About?
At its core, Section 114 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 defines the offence of "hurt." The section states:
"Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt."
That is it. Just one sentence. But do not let the brevity fool you. This single line opens the door to a wide range of physical harm that the law recognises as criminal. Whether someone slaps another person, pushes them down, infects them with a disease intentionally, or causes temporary physical weakness — all of these can fall under the definition of hurt under Section 114.
The beauty of this section lies in its simplicity and broad coverage. It does not require a weapon. It does not require a hospital visit. It does not even require a visible injury. As long as the victim experiences bodily pain, disease, or infirmity because of someone else's action (or inaction, in some cases), the offence of hurt is made out.
The Three Pillars of Hurt: Bodily Pain, Disease, and Infirmity
To truly understand Section 114, you need to break it down into its three essential ingredients. The law recognises three ways in which hurt can be caused:
Bodily Pain
This is the most straightforward and common form of hurt. Bodily pain means any physical discomfort or suffering caused to another person. It could be as minor as a slap, a pinch, a push, or a scratch. The law does not measure the intensity of the pain. Even momentary pain is enough. What matters is that the pain is physical, not emotional or mental.
A very important point here is that direct physical contact is not always necessary for the offence to be established. For example, if someone pulls away a chair just as another person is about to sit, and that person falls and experiences pain, it still counts as hurt. The accused did not touch the victim directly, but the action caused bodily pain. Courts in India have upheld this interpretation in several cases.
Disease
The second way hurt can be caused is by inflicting disease on another person. This happens when someone intentionally or recklessly transmits an infectious illness to another individual. A classic example would be knowingly spreading a sexually transmitted disease to a partner without disclosure. Another example could be deliberately exposing someone to a contagious infection with the intent to make them sick.
The key element here is that the disease must be a direct result of the accused person's conduct. If someone contracts an illness through ordinary social contact without any malicious intent from the other party, it would not attract Section 114.
Infirmity
The third ingredient is infirmity, which refers to any temporary or permanent impairment of the body's normal functioning. This could include causing someone to become unconscious through drugs or alcohol, inducing temporary paralysis, or creating a state of physical weakness that prevents the person from performing their usual activities.
Infirmity is broader than just pain. It covers any condition that weakens or disables the body, even if temporarily. For instance, if someone administers a sedative to another person without their consent, causing them to lose consciousness or motor control, that would amount to infirmity under Section 114.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt: Section 115 of the BNS
Now, here is where things get more serious. Section 114 merely defines what hurt is. But Section 115 of the BNS deals with voluntarily causing hurt — and this is what attracts punishment.
A person is said to voluntarily cause hurt when:
- They do an act with the intention of causing hurt to someone, or
- They do an act with the knowledge that it is likely to cause hurt, and
- Hurt is actually caused as a result.
So, intention or knowledge plus actual harm — that is the formula. If someone punches another person in anger, knowing that it will cause pain, and it does cause pain, they have voluntarily caused hurt.
Punishment Under Section 115
If a person is found guilty of voluntarily causing hurt (except in cases of grave and sudden provocation, which we will discuss shortly), the punishment is:
- Imprisonment of either description (simple or rigorous) for a term that may extend to one year, or
- A fine that may extend to ten thousand rupees, or
- Both imprisonment and fine.
This is a relatively lighter punishment compared to grievous hurt, which reflects the lesser severity of the offence. However, it is still a cognizable and bailable offence in most cases, meaning the police can arrest without a warrant, but bail is usually available as a matter of right.
Grave and Sudden Provocation: The Exception Under Section 122
The law recognises that human beings are not robots. Sometimes, people act in the heat of the moment due to extreme provocation. That is why Section 122(1) of the BNS provides a reduced punishment for voluntarily causing hurt on grave and sudden provocation.
If someone causes hurt in such circumstances, without intending or knowing that they might hurt anyone other than the person who provoked them, the punishment is reduced to:
- Imprisonment up to one month, or
- A fine up to five thousand rupees, or
- Both.
This is a significant reduction from the standard punishment under Section 115, reflecting the law's understanding of human psychology and emotional reactions.
Hurt vs. Grievous Hurt: Why the Distinction Matters
This is one of the most important aspects of understanding Section 114. Not every injury qualifies as grievous hurt. The law draws a clear line between simple hurt (Section 114) and grievous hurt (Section 116 of the BNS). Knowing the difference is crucial because the punishment varies dramatically.
While Section 114 covers minor to moderate physical harm, Section 116 of the BNS lists eight specific types of injuries that qualify as grievous hurt. These include:
- Emasculation — depriving a man of his virility or causing impotency
- Permanent privation of the sight of either eye — permanent blindness in one or both eyes
- Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear — permanent deafness
- Privation of any member or joint — loss of any limb or joint
- Destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint
- Permanent disfiguration of the head or face — lasting damage to facial appearance
- Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth
- Any hurt that endangers life, or causes severe bodily pain for fifteen days or more, or makes the victim unable to do ordinary work for fifteen days or more
Notice that the threshold for grievous hurt is much higher. It involves permanent damage, life-threatening conditions, or prolonged suffering. Simple hurt, on the other hand, can be temporary, minor, and non-life-threatening.
The punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 117 of the BNS is also far more severe:
- Imprisonment up to seven years, and
- A fine.
In aggravated cases — such as when grievous hurt causes permanent disability or leaves the victim in a persistent vegetative state — the punishment can go up to life imprisonment, which means imprisonment for the remainder of the person's natural life.
Key Legal Principles and Judicial Interpretations
Over the decades, Indian courts have interpreted the concept of hurt in numerous judgments. Many of these principles continue to apply under the BNS because the substantive definition has remained largely unchanged from the old IPC.
No Force Required
One of the most important legal principles is that the use of force is not essential to constitute hurt. If an act causes bodily pain, disease, or infirmity, it is hurt — regardless of whether force was used. For example, administering poison through food involves no direct force, but it clearly causes hurt.
No Direct Physical Contact Required
As mentioned earlier, direct physical contact between the accused and the victim is not mandatory. If the accused sets in motion a chain of events that leads to hurt, the offence is complete. Tripping someone, setting a trap, or causing an accident through deliberate action can all amount to hurt.
Mental Pain is Not Covered
This is a critical limitation. Section 114 only covers physical harm. Mental pain, emotional distress, or psychological trauma — however severe — do not fall under the definition of hurt. Of course, other sections of the BNS may cover mental harassment (such as those dealing with cruelty or criminal intimidation), but not Section 114.
Duration of Pain is Immaterial
Whether the pain lasts for a few seconds or several days, it is still hurt under Section 114. The law does not set a minimum duration. Even momentary pain caused by a slap or a push is sufficient.
How Section 114 of BNS Differs from Section 319 of the IPC
If you are familiar with the old Indian Penal Code, you might be wondering how Section 114 of the BNS compares with Section 319 of the IPC, which was the corresponding provision for hurt.
The answer is: the definition is almost identical. Section 319 of the IPC also defined hurt as causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity. The BNS has retained this definition word-for-word in Section 114. So, in terms of substantive law, nothing has really changed.
However, there are some important differences in the surrounding framework:
- Section numbering has changed. What was Section 319 IPC is now Section 114 BNS.
- Voluntarily causing hurt was Section 321 IPC; it is now Section 115 BNS.
- Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt was Section 323 IPC; it is now Section 115(2) BNS.
- Grievous hurt was Section 320 IPC; it is now Section 116 BNS.
- Punishment for grievous hurt was Section 325 IPC; it is now Section 117 BNS.
- The duration for severe pain or inability to work to qualify as grievous hurt has been reduced from 20 days to 15 days under the BNS.
So, while the core definition of hurt remains the same, the BNS has streamlined the numbering and made some procedural and punishment-related adjustments.
Practical Examples to Illustrate Section 114
Let us look at some everyday scenarios to understand how Section 114 works in practice:
- Scenario 1: During a heated argument, Person A slaps Person B. Person B feels pain and has a red mark on the cheek. This is simple hurt under Section 114. If A intended to slap B or knew that slapping would cause pain, it becomes voluntarily causing hurt under Section 115.
- Scenario 2: Person A pushes Person B during a crowd rush. B falls, scrapes their knee, and experiences pain. Even though the push was brief and the injury minor, it still qualifies as hurt.
- Scenario 3: Person A knowingly has a sexually transmitted infection and engages in unprotected sexual activity with Person B without disclosure. B contracts the disease. This is hurt by disease under Section 114.
- Scenario 4: Person A mixes a sedative into Person B's drink without their knowledge. B drinks it, becomes drowsy, and loses coordination for several hours. This is hurt by infirmity.
- Scenario 5: Person A throws acid at Person B, but the acid only causes minor burns and pain for a few days without permanent disfigurement. This would still be hurt (and possibly attract other sections), but not grievous hurt unless it meets the criteria under Section 116.
Bail, Cognizance, and Trial Procedure
For anyone facing charges under Section 114 or Section 115 of the BNS, it is important to understand the procedural aspects:
- The offence of voluntarily causing hurt (Section 115) is generally cognizable — meaning the police can register an FIR and arrest without a warrant.
- It is also bailable in most cases — meaning the accused has a right to seek bail.
- The offence is compoundable in many situations — meaning the victim and the accused can reach a settlement, and the case can be withdrawn with the court's permission.
- The trial usually takes place in a Magistrate's court, as it is a less serious offence compared to grievous hurt or attempt to murder.
However, if the hurt is committed against a public servant in the discharge of their duty, or if it is part of a larger criminal conspiracy, the procedural treatment may differ.
Why Section 114 Matters in Everyday Life
You might think that a section dealing with "hurt" is only relevant in serious criminal cases. But the truth is, Section 114 of the BNS touches everyday life more often than you realise. Road rage incidents, domestic disputes, fights in public places, altercations at workplaces — many of these situations can lead to charges under this section.
Understanding what constitutes hurt, what does not, and what the legal consequences are can help ordinary citizens:
- Protect their rights if they are victims of physical harm
- Avoid unintended legal trouble by understanding where the line is drawn
- Navigate the justice system more effectively if they are falsely accused
It is also worth noting that in many cases, Section 114 and Section 115 are invoked along with other sections of the BNS. For example, a physical assault might attract charges of hurt, criminal force, and assault simultaneously. The police and courts look at the totality of the circumstances before deciding which sections apply.
Conclusion
Section 114 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, is the foundation upon which India's legal framework for physical harm is built. It may seem like a small provision, but it carries enormous weight in the criminal justice system. By defining hurt as the causing of bodily pain, disease, or infirmity, the law ensures that even minor acts of physical violence do not go unpunished.
At the same time, the law is careful to distinguish between simple hurt and grievous hurt, ensuring that the punishment fits the crime. The retention of the old IPC definition in the new BNS shows that some legal principles are timeless — but the updated section numbers, streamlined structure, and adjusted thresholds reflect India's effort to modernise its criminal laws.
Whether you are a law student, a legal professional, or simply a concerned citizen, understanding Section 114 is essential. It reminds us that every human body deserves respect and protection under the law, and that even a moment of physical pain inflicted on another person can have serious legal consequences. In a society that values dignity and non-violence, this section stands as a quiet but powerful guardian of personal safety.
COMMENTS