India, after independence in 1947, faced enormous challenges of poverty, unemployment, and inequality. A large part of the working population was engaged in unorganized sectors where wages were neither fair nor consistent. Workers were often exploited, forced to work for very low pay, and lacked bargaining power. To address these issues, the Indian government introduced the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
This law ensured that every worker engaged in certain employments would receive fair and minimum wages to maintain a decent standard of living. It was one of the earliest labor welfare laws passed in independent India and continues to play a vital role in protecting the interests of workers even today.
This blog will explain the objectives, scope, provisions, implementation, challenges, and significance of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in detail.
Introduction
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is one of the earliest and most important labor welfare legislations enacted in independent India. It was introduced at a time when the country was struggling with widespread poverty, unemployment, and economic inequality. A vast majority of India’s workforce was engaged in unorganized sectors such as agriculture, construction, textile, and small industries, where workers were often paid very low wages, far below subsistence levels. With little bargaining power and no formal protection, they were highly vulnerable to exploitation.
Recognizing the need to protect workers from unfair wage practices, the Indian government enacted the Minimum Wages Act in 1948. The Act gave the Central and State Governments the authority to fix and revise minimum wages for employments listed as “scheduled employments.” Its core purpose was to ensure that workers received wages sufficient to meet basic living needs, including food, clothing, housing, healthcare, and education for their families.
The Act also laid down rules for timely payment of wages, working hours, overtime, rest days, and record-keeping by employers. It reflected the ideals of the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Indian Constitution, particularly Articles 39 and 43, which emphasize equal pay for equal work and securing a living wage for workers.
Over the years, the Minimum Wages Act has become a cornerstone of India’s labor welfare framework, protecting millions of workers in both rural and urban sectors. Although challenges in enforcement remain, the Act marked the beginning of a systematic approach to labor rights in India, setting the foundation for future reforms such as the Code on Wages, 2019.
Why India Need Minimum Wages Act
India’s labor market has historically been vast, diverse, and deeply unequal. A large portion of its workforce has always been engaged in agriculture, construction, small-scale industries, domestic work, and other informal sectors. These workers often lacked bargaining power, unions, or collective representation. Employers, particularly in unorganized sectors, frequently exploited this weakness by paying wages that were extremely low, irregular, and insufficient even to meet the workers’ basic needs. This created cycles of poverty, indebtedness, and social inequality.
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was introduced as a protective measure to address these realities. India needed this law for several reasons:
-
Protection against exploitation: Without legal intervention, many workers were forced to accept wages far below fair standards due to unemployment and poverty. The Act provided a wage floor, below which no employer could pay.
-
Ensuring basic living standards: A minimum wage guarantees that workers can afford essentials such as food, clothing, housing, and healthcare, which are critical for maintaining human dignity.
-
Reducing inequality: By standardizing wages across occupations and regions, the Act aimed to narrow the wage gap between workers of similar skill levels and reduce income disparities.
-
Supporting social justice goals: The law reflected the spirit of the Constitution, particularly the Directive Principles of State Policy, which emphasize securing a living wage and fair working conditions for all citizens.
-
Stability in labor markets: Fair wages reduce labor unrest, strikes, and disputes, contributing to industrial peace and economic growth.
-
Combating poverty: By ensuring minimum earnings, the Act became a tool for poverty alleviation, especially for marginalized communities dependent on daily wages.
In short, India needed the Minimum Wages Act to protect vulnerable workers, improve living conditions, and promote economic and social justice. It was not only an economic measure but also a moral and constitutional responsibility of the state to safeguard its citizens from exploitation.
.png "Minimum Wages Act, 1948")
History of the Minimum Wages Act in India
The history of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in India is closely linked to the country’s socio-economic conditions in the early 20th century. During British colonial rule, a large part of the Indian workforce was employed in agriculture, plantations, textile mills, and small industries. Wages were generally extremely low, irregular, and exploitative, especially in unorganized sectors. Workers had little bargaining power, and there were no comprehensive laws to protect them from underpayment.
The idea of fixing minimum wages first emerged during the First World War, when rising inflation led to discussions about protecting industrial workers. In 1928, the Royal Commission on Labour recommended setting minimum wages in certain industries. Later, during the Second World War, the Government of India set up Wage Boards in industries such as cotton and jute, which further highlighted the need for a permanent legal framework.
Internationally, the movement for minimum wages also gained momentum. The International Labour Organization (ILO) adopted conventions in the 1920s and 1930s, encouraging member countries to implement wage protection systems. India, being a member of the ILO, was influenced by these global developments.
After independence in 1947, the new government faced widespread poverty, inequality, and labor exploitation. Protecting workers became a priority for nation-building. The Constituent Assembly also emphasized the importance of social and economic justice, as reflected in the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution. Against this background, the Minimum Wages Act was enacted in 1948, becoming one of the first labor welfare laws passed in independent India.
The Act provided the government with the power to fix and revise minimum wages for scheduled employments. Over the years, states expanded the list of employments under the Act, covering millions of workers in agriculture, construction, domestic work, and other unorganized sectors.
Thus, the history of the Act reflects India’s journey from colonial exploitation to an independent nation determined to uphold fair wages, social justice, and labor rights as the foundation of economic development.
Objectives of Minimum Wages Act, 1948
The primary aim of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was to protect workers against unfair wage practices and exploitation. The objectives of the Act can be summarized as follows:
-
To fix minimum wages in industries and occupations where wages were historically low.
-
To ensure that employers do not pay workers less than the prescribed wage.
-
To guarantee a minimum level of income for workers, enabling them to secure food, shelter, clothing, education, and healthcare.
-
To empower the government to revise and update wage rates in line with rising costs of living.
-
To reduce inequality in wage structures and promote fairness in labor markets.
-
To achieve social justice and economic equality as envisioned in the Indian Constitution.
Thus, the Act was not only an economic law but also a social welfare measure that reflected India’s post-independence commitment to protecting vulnerable sections of society.
Important Provisions and Sections of Minimum Wages Act, 1948
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948, is applicable to the whole of India as provided under Section 1 of the Act. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948, is a critical piece of legislation in India aimed at combating labor exploitation by ensuring a minimum wage for workers in certain employment sectors. Below are some of the important provisions and sections of the Act -
Section 3 – Fixing of Minimum Rates of Wages
This is the foundation of the Act, giving the power to the appropriate government—Central or State depending on the nature of employment—to fix minimum wages in scheduled industries. The government may prescribe wages for:
-
Time work: Wages fixed per hour, day, week, or month.
-
Piece work: Wages paid based on units of output produced.
-
Guaranteed time rate: Even in piece-rate jobs, workers are entitled to a minimum time-based wage.
-
Overtime work: Higher wages when employees work beyond normal hours.
The section also allows governments to fix different wage rates for:
-
Different scheduled employments.
-
Different classes of workers (skilled, semi-skilled, unskilled, apprentices).
-
Different geographical regions within the same state.
This flexibility ensures that minimum wages reflect economic conditions, skill levels, and cost of living differences across India.
Section 4 – Minimum Rate of Wages
This section defines what the term “minimum rate of wages” means. It is not limited to just a basic salary but includes multiple components:
-
Basic rate of wages – The core wage amount fixed by the government.
-
Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) – Adjustments linked to the Consumer Price Index to account for inflation.
-
Cash value of concessions – If the employer provides food, housing, or other benefits at concessional rates, their value is added to wages.
By including these components, Section 4 ensures that minimum wages remain realistic and fair, protecting workers from inflation and rising living costs.
Section 5 – Procedure for Fixing and Revising Wages
Section 5 outlines the two methods through which governments can fix or revise wages:
-
Committee method: The government appoints committees and sub-committees with representatives of employers, employees, and independent experts. These bodies study wage conditions and recommend rates.
-
Notification method: The government publishes proposals for wage fixation in the Official Gazette and invites feedback from the public, trade unions, and employers. After considering objections, final rates are notified.
Importantly, the Act mandates that minimum wages must be reviewed at least once every five years, though many states revise them more frequently.
Section 12 – Payment of Minimum Wages
This section makes it mandatory for employers to pay workers at least the minimum wage prescribed under the Act. No employer can legally pay less than the notified wage.
Payment can be made:
-
In cash, which is the general rule.
-
In kind, such as food grains or housing, but only if it is customary and approved by the government.
Employers are also prohibited from making unauthorized deductions, except for those permitted by law, such as Provident Fund contributions, ESI contributions, or income tax.
Section 13 – Hours of Work and Normal Working Day
Section 13 empowers the government to define what constitutes a normal working day for employees. This provision includes:
-
Fixing daily working hours.
-
Providing rest intervals during working hours.
-
Weekly holidays and compensatory off-days.
-
Higher wages for work performed on weekly rest days or national holidays.
This section ensures that workers are not exploited through excessively long working hours without proper rest.
Section 14 – Overtime Wages
Under Section 14, if an employee works beyond the normal working day or working hours fixed under Section 13, he or she is entitled to overtime wages. The rate of overtime is generally twice the normal wage rate, though state rules may vary.
This provision discourages employers from forcing employees into long working hours without proper compensation.
Section 18 – Maintenance of Registers and Records
Employers are legally required under Section 18 to maintain registers and records related to wages and employment. These include:
-
A register of employees with their names, job roles, and wage rates.
-
Details of hours worked, overtime performed, and wages paid.
-
Records of deductions, allowances, and benefits.
This documentation allows government inspectors to monitor compliance and provides evidence in case of disputes.
Section 19 – Inspectors
Section 19 empowers the government to appoint Inspectors to enforce the provisions of the Act. Inspectors have significant powers, including:
-
Entering and inspecting premises where employees are working.
-
Examining registers, records, and wages paid.
-
Questioning employers and employees.
-
Seizing documents if necessary to prove violations.
This provision ensures that compliance with the Act is not just theoretical but actively enforced.
Section 20 – Claims and Complaints
Section 20 creates a mechanism for employees to file claims if they are underpaid or not paid according to the Act.
-
Claims can be filed before an authority appointed by the government (often a Labour Commissioner, Labour Court, or Magistrate).
-
The authority has the power to order payment of the shortfall plus compensation up to ten times the underpaid amount.
-
Workers, trade unions, or even inspectors can file such claims on behalf of employees.
This section empowers workers to fight for their rights without fear of losing jobs or being ignored.
Section 22 – Penalties for Offences
This section prescribes penalties for employers who contravene the Act.
-
If an employer pays less than the minimum wage or violates wage conditions, he may be punished with imprisonment up to six months, or a fine up to ₹500 (in earlier law, though amended amounts are higher in practice).
-
Repeat offences may attract harsher punishments.
The penalties are meant to deter employers from exploiting workers and to reinforce the mandatory nature of minimum wages.
Section 24 – Cognizance of Offences
Section 24 specifies that courts cannot take up offences under this Act unless a complaint is made by or with the approval of the appropriate government. This prevents misuse of the law through false complaints while ensuring that genuine cases are prosecuted.
Section 27 – Addition of Employments
This section allows the appropriate government to add new industries or occupations to the Schedule of the Act. This is important because it makes the Act flexible and adaptable. As new industries emerge—such as IT-enabled services, security services, or domestic work—governments can bring them under minimum wage coverage.
This provision has allowed the Act to expand over time and protect millions of workers in previously uncovered sectors.
The sections of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, together create a comprehensive framework for protecting workers against wage exploitation. By empowering governments to fix and revise wages, mandating timely and fair payment, regulating working hours, providing overtime pay, ensuring record maintenance, and prescribing penalties, the Act safeguards the rights of workers.
The flexibility given under Section 27 to expand coverage ensures that the law remains relevant even in changing economic conditions. Although enforcement challenges remain, these provisions represent one of the strongest foundations for labor rights and social justice in India.
Power to make rules under Minimum Wages Act, 1948
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 provides the broad framework for wage protection in India, but its successful implementation requires detailed procedures, formats, and enforcement mechanisms. To address this, the Act empowers both the Central Government and the State Governments to make rules that give effect to its provisions. This division of powers reflects India’s federal structure, where certain employments fall under central jurisdiction, while others remain under the purview of individual states.
The Central Government is authorized to make rules for scheduled employments such as mines, oil fields, railways, major ports, and industries directly under its control. To operationalize the Act for central employments, the government framed the Central Minimum Wages Rules, 1950. These rules provide detailed instructions on maintaining wage registers, submission of returns, working hours, rest intervals, overtime payments, and inspection procedures.
The State Governments, on the other hand, have the power to make rules for scheduled employments within their own territories, such as agriculture, construction, and local industries. Each state has issued its own Minimum Wages Rules—for example, the Delhi Minimum Wages Rules, 1950; the Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963; and the Tamil Nadu Minimum Wages Rules, 1953. These rules adapt the provisions of the central law to the economic realities and labor conditions of the state.
The scope of these rules is wide. They regulate how employers must maintain registers and records, the manner in which wages should be paid, conditions under which wages may be paid in kind, the process for filing and adjudicating claims under the Act, and the duties of inspectors to ensure compliance. The rules also specify the penalties and procedures for prosecuting employers who fail to follow the law.
Rules are first published in draft form in the Official Gazette to invite objections and suggestions from stakeholders. After considering feedback, the final rules are notified and become binding. This process ensures transparency and provides room for participation by workers, employers, and the public.
In summary, the power to make rules under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is what gives the Act its practical shape. While the Act lays down the principles and objectives, the rules supply the operational details needed for day-to-day enforcement. This dual role of the Centre and the States ensures that minimum wage protection is both nationally consistent and regionally adaptable.
Case Laws Related to Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Judicial interpretation has played a major role in shaping the scope, implementation, and spirit of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Courts in India have repeatedly emphasized that the Act is a social welfare legislation, and its provisions must be interpreted in favor of workers to prevent exploitation. Below are some landmark case laws that explain important principles under the Act.
1. Unichoyi v. State of Kerala (1962 AIR 12, SC)
This is one of the earliest and most important cases interpreting the Act. Employers in Kerala challenged the government’s fixation of minimum wages, arguing that it was too high and beyond their capacity to pay.
-
Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Act and clarified that minimum wage is not dependent on the financial capacity of the employer. It is a statutory obligation that must be paid regardless of whether the employer finds it burdensome.
-
Principle: The Court emphasized that the purpose of the Act is to guarantee workers the means to sustain themselves, and employers cannot use their inability to pay as a defense.
2. U. Unichoyi v. State of Kerala (1961 SCR (1) 646)
In this related case, the Court again highlighted that minimum wages are the floor level wage, meant to prevent exploitation. It stated that once wages are notified, employers are bound to comply, and courts cannot interfere merely because wages are considered excessive by employers.
3. Chandra Bhavan Boarding and Lodging, Bangalore v. State of Mysore (1970 AIR 2042, SC)
The question here was whether fixing different minimum wages for different kinds of work was valid. Employers argued that this classification was discriminatory.
-
Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the government’s power to fix different rates for different employments, regions, and classes of workers.
-
Principle: The Court clarified that differential wages do not amount to discrimination but are based on rational factors like skill, nature of work, and cost of living in different regions.
4. Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Ajmer (1955 AIR 33, SC)
This was one of the first constitutional challenges to the Act. Employers argued that fixing minimum wages violated their fundamental right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
-
Judgment: The Supreme Court rejected this argument, holding that the Act was a valid reasonable restriction on the right to trade and business in the interest of general public welfare.
-
Principle: Minimum wages are constitutionally valid as they promote social and economic justice, aligning with the Directive Principles of State Policy.
5. People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982 AIR 1473, SC)
This case arose during the construction of facilities for the 1982 Asian Games in Delhi, where workers were paid less than minimum wages.
-
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that payment of wages below minimum wages amounts to forced labor under Article 23 of the Constitution, which prohibits forced labor and begar.
-
Principle: The case established that minimum wages are not just statutory rights but also constitutional rights under the protection against forced labor.
6. Hydro (Engineers) Pvt. Ltd. v. Workmen (AIR 1969 SC 182)
The Court clarified the concept of fair wages, living wages, and minimum wages.
-
Principle:
-
Minimum Wage is the wage that must cover the basic needs of a worker and his family.
-
Fair Wage is higher than minimum wage, balancing the industry’s capacity to pay with workers’ needs.
-
Living Wage is the ideal standard, ensuring comfort, education, health, and social security.
The Court held that minimum wage is the statutory floor, below which employment is not legal.
-
7. Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan (1983 AIR 328, SC)
In this case, workers employed in famine relief work in Rajasthan were paid less than minimum wages.
-
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that even in famine relief work, the government is bound to pay minimum wages.
-
Principle: The Court reinforced that no exception can be made to the obligation of paying minimum wages, even when the employer is the government itself.
8. Basti Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of U.P. (1979 AIR 262, SC)
Here, the Court upheld the principle that minimum wage notifications must be strictly followed, and employers cannot evade responsibility by entering into private agreements with employees for lower wages.
-
Principle: The Act overrides individual contracts if they are inconsistent with statutory minimum wages.
These case laws together form the judicial backbone of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. They clarify that:
-
Minimum wage is a statutory right and a constitutional guarantee against exploitation.
-
Employers cannot cite financial incapacity as a defense.
-
Differential wages are legally valid based on rational classification.
-
Payment of less than minimum wages amounts to forced labor under Article 23.
-
Even the government cannot escape its duty to pay minimum wages in relief work.
Thus, the judiciary has consistently interpreted the Act in a pro-worker manner, reinforcing its role as a social welfare legislation aimed at promoting dignity, equality, and justice for India’s labor force.
Code on Wages, 2019
The Code on Wages, 2019, is a landmark legislation in India that consolidates and amends the laws relating to wages and bonus and matters connected therewith. It was introduced as part of the Indian government's initiative to simplify and modernize labor regulations and to ensure universal application of the provisions of wages and bonus to all workers in the country. The Code on Wages, 2019, seeks to subsume four previously existing labor laws:
- The Payment of Wages Act, 1936
- The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
- The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965
- The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976
The Code on Wages, 2019 is one of the four major labor codes introduced by the Government of India as part of its effort to simplify, modernize, and consolidate the country’s labor laws. Before this Code, wage-related matters were governed by four separate legislations: the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, and the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. Each of these laws had different definitions, procedures, and compliance requirements, often creating confusion for both employers and workers. The Code on Wages, 2019 was passed by Parliament in August 2019 to bring uniformity and remove inconsistencies by combining these laws into a single framework.
The primary purpose of the Code is to ensure that every worker in India, regardless of sector or occupation, is entitled to fair and timely wages. Unlike the Minimum Wages Act, which applied only to scheduled employments, the Code has universal coverage and applies to all industries, trades, businesses, and establishments. One of its most significant features is the introduction of a national floor wage, to be fixed by the Central Government. States cannot fix minimum wages below this floor, though they are free to prescribe higher rates depending on local conditions. This provision ensures a basic standard of wage protection across the country and prevents states from fixing unreasonably low rates.
The Code also introduces a uniform definition of wages, which reduces disputes and confusion that existed earlier due to varying definitions in different labor laws. Wages under the Code include basic pay, dearness allowance, and retaining allowance, while excluding components such as house rent allowance, conveyance, bonus, and gratuity. This standardization ensures transparency and helps both employers and employees clearly understand what constitutes wages.
Another important aspect of the Code is the guarantee of equal remuneration for equal work, prohibiting gender-based discrimination in matters of recruitment and wage payments. This provision incorporates and strengthens the principle earlier found in the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, thereby promoting workplace equality. The Code also lays down clear rules for the timely payment of wages, specifying that daily wage workers must be paid at the end of the day, weekly wage earners at the end of the week, and monthly wage earners before the 7th of the following month. Payments can be made in cash, cheque, or through digital transfers, reflecting the push towards greater financial transparency.
The provisions regarding overtime wages remain consistent with earlier laws, requiring employers to pay workers at a rate higher than the ordinary rate, usually twice the normal wage, for hours worked beyond the prescribed working day. The Code also carries forward the provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, ensuring that employees earning below a certain wage ceiling are entitled to bonuses, subject to profitability conditions of the employer.
To ensure compliance, the Code introduces an Inspector-cum-Facilitator system. Unlike the traditional inspector system, which was often criticized for being overly punitive and prone to misuse, the new system aims to balance enforcement with guidance. Inspectors are expected not only to monitor compliance but also to help employers understand and meet their obligations. In addition, the Code emphasizes digital compliance and record-keeping, reducing paperwork and promoting transparency.
The Code prescribes penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment for repeated offences. Employers who fail to pay wages on time, pay less than the minimum wage, or discriminate on the basis of gender may face legal consequences. These strict penalties are designed to deter exploitation and ensure accountability.
The Code on Wages, 2019 has several advantages. It simplifies the legal framework by replacing four separate laws with one, provides universal wage protection to all workers, and creates uniform definitions that reduce disputes. It also promotes transparency, encourages digital record-keeping, and strengthens the enforcement mechanism. However, the Code is not free from criticism. Some experts argue that the national floor wage may be fixed at a level too low to be considered a true living wage, limiting its effectiveness. Others point out that enforcement remains a challenge, especially in the vast unorganized sector where awareness and monitoring are weak. Moreover, while the Code promotes uniformity, states still retain the power to fix minimum wages above the national floor, which may result in disparities across regions.
Compared to the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Code on Wages represents a major reform. While the old Act applied only to scheduled employments and had different procedures in each state, the new Code ensures that every worker in India is covered. The introduction of a national floor wage, the standardization of definitions, and the emphasis on equality and digital compliance mark a clear step towards modernization of India’s wage laws.
In conclusion, the Code on Wages, 2019 is a landmark legislation that reflects India’s commitment to labor welfare and social justice in a modern economy. By consolidating four different laws into a single comprehensive framework, it simplifies compliance for employers and strengthens protections for workers. However, the success of the Code will depend on its effective implementation, regular revision of the floor wage, and awareness among workers of their rights. If enforced properly, the Code has the potential to transform wage protection in India, ensuring that every worker receives fair, timely, and non-discriminatory wages.
The concept of Floor Wage under the Code
The concept of "Floor Wage" is a pivotal feature introduced in the Code on Wages, 2019. It represents a minimum level of pay that employers are mandated to adhere to, across the country. This concept is aimed at ensuring a basic standard of living for all workers, irrespective of the sector or state in which they are employed. Here are some key aspects of the Floor Wage under the Code:
The Floor Wage is defined as the minimum wage that is applicable nationwide, below which no employer can pay its workers. The primary purpose behind setting a Floor Wage is to ensure a minimum standard of living for every worker, to safeguard their health, efficiency, and well-being.
The Central Government is responsible for fixing the Floor Wage, taking into account living standards, cost of living, and other socio-economic factors. While determining the Floor Wage, the government may also consult with the Central Advisory Board, which includes representatives from employers, employees, and independent persons.
The concept ensures that there is a baseline wage across different states in India, promoting wage uniformity. While states can set minimum wages above the Floor Wage, they cannot prescribe any wage rates that are below this floor level. This is particularly significant in ensuring that workers across the country, especially those in unorganized sectors or in states with lower economic development, are guaranteed a minimum wage.
Although the Floor Wage sets a nationwide minimum threshold, it allows for variations based on geographical areas. This means that while no state can go below the Floor Wage, the actual minimum wages can vary from one state to another, or even within states, based on economic conditions, cost of living, and other relevant factors.
For employers, the Floor Wage means that there is a minimum statutory wage they must pay, which could standardize wage levels and reduce wage disparities. For workers, it promises a level of income security, ensuring that they are paid at least the minimum wage necessary for a basic standard of living, irrespective of where they work within the country.
The Code on Wages, 2019, includes provisions for the enforcement of the Floor Wage and penalties for non-compliance. This ensures that employers adhere to the mandated wage levels, and workers have a mechanism to seek redress if they are paid less than the Floor Wage.
The introduction of the Floor Wage concept through the Code on Wages, 2019, represents a significant step towards improving wage equity and ensuring that all workers receive a minimum income that supports their basic living needs. It is an effort to address income inequality and promote fair labor practices across India.
Scope and Coverage
The Act applies to certain categories of employment called scheduled employments. These are employments where workers are most at risk of exploitation due to lack of organization, representation, or bargaining power. Both the Central and State Governments are empowered to notify industries and occupations that will come under the Act.
The coverage of the Act extends to:
-
Agricultural laborers.
-
Industrial workers such as those in textiles, mines, quarries, and brick kilns.
-
Workers in construction and road transport.
-
Employment in oil fields, plantations, and stone-breaking activities.
-
In some states, domestic workers, security guards, and sanitation workers have also been brought under the Act.
By allowing states to expand the list of scheduled employments, the Act remains flexible and adaptable to new economic realities.
Conclusion
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was a landmark step in India’s journey toward labor welfare and social justice. Enacted soon after independence, it addressed one of the most pressing issues of the time—exploitation of workers through extremely low and unfair wages. By empowering the Central and State Governments to fix and revise minimum wages, the Act created a legal framework that guaranteed workers a basic floor of income, below which no employer could go.
The Act also reflected the constitutional vision of equality and justice, as seen in the Directive Principles of State Policy, which emphasize fair wages, decent living standards, and protection of labor. Over the decades, the Act has helped millions of workers in sectors like agriculture, construction, and small-scale industries secure fair pay, contributing to poverty reduction and improved living conditions.
However, challenges such as poor enforcement, lack of awareness among workers, and disparities in wage rates across states have limited its effectiveness in some areas. Despite these issues, the Act laid the foundation for labor rights in India and inspired later reforms, including the Code on Wages, 2019, which seeks to universalize wage protection for all workers.
In essence, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, is not just a law about wages—it is a symbol of India’s commitment to dignity, equality, and social justice for its working population. It reminds us that economic progress must go hand in hand with the protection of those who form the backbone of the economy: the workers.
.png)
COMMENTS