Article 32 of the Indian Constitution

Article 32 of the Indian Constitution: The Heart and Soul of Fundamental Rights Introduction Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is one of...

Article 32 of the Indian Constitution: The Heart and Soul of Fundamental Rights

Introduction

Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is one of the most significant provisions that ensure the protection of fundamental rights. Often referred to as the "heart and soul of the Constitution" by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, this article empowers individuals to approach the Supreme Court directly in case of a violation of their fundamental rights. It serves as a guardian of justice and upholds the democratic values of the country.

---

What is Article 32?

Article 32 provides the right to constitutional remedies. It grants individuals the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. This provision ensures that no individual’s rights are infringed upon without legal recourse.

Key Provisions of Article 32

The article states:

• The right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights is guaranteed.

• The Supreme Court has the power to issue writs for the enforcement of rights under Part III of the Constitution.

• Parliament may confer similar powers on any other court within the jurisdiction of India.

• The right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 cannot be suspended except as provided by the Constitution.

---

Importance of Article 32

1. Guardian of Fundamental Rights: Article 32 acts as a protective shield for fundamental rights, ensuring that any breach can be challenged in the Supreme Court.

2. Judicial Review: It allows the judiciary to assess and strike down any law or action that violates fundamental rights.

3. Empowerment of Citizens: It provides a direct mechanism for individuals to seek justice, reinforcing democracy.

4. Prevention of Arbitrary Actions: It acts as a check on the executive and legislative organs of the government, preventing them from curbing individual rights.

---

Types of Writs Under Article 32

To enforce fundamental rights, the Supreme Court can issue five types of writs:

1. Habeas Corpus

• Used to ensure a person's release from unlawful detention.

• A safeguard against illegal arrest and imprisonment.

2. Mandamus

• A command issued by the court directing a public authority to perform its duty.

• Ensures accountability in public administration.

3. Prohibition

• Issued by a higher court to a lower court or tribunal to stop it from exceeding its jurisdiction.

• Prevents overreach by subordinate courts.

4. Certiorari

• Issued by a higher court to quash an order passed by a lower court or tribunal if it is found to be unconstitutional.

• Ensures that justice is served without procedural errors.

5. Quo Warranto

• Challenges the legality of a person's claim to a public office.

• Prevents unauthorized occupation of government positions.

---

Landmark Cases Related to Article 32

Several Supreme Court judgments have reinforced the power of Article 32:

1. A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)

• Established that the right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right.

2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)

• Expanded the scope of fundamental rights, making Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) more inclusive.

3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

• Emphasized the importance of judicial review under Article 32.

4. D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar (1987)

• Used Article 32 to challenge the misuse of ordinance-making powers by the executive.

---

Limitations of Article 32

While Article 32 is a powerful tool, it has some limitations:

• The right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 can be suspended during a National Emergency (as per Article 359).

• It can only be invoked for fundamental rights violations, not for other legal matters.

• The Supreme Court may refuse to entertain petitions if an alternative remedy is available through High Courts under Article 226.

---

Difference Between Article 32 and Article 226

Both Articles 32 and 226 allow individuals to seek legal remedies, but there are some differences:

Feature	Article 32	Article 226
Jurisdiction	Supreme Court	High Courts
Scope	Only fundamental rights	Fundamental and other legal rights
Writs Issued	Yes	Yes
Suspension During Emergency	Yes	No

---

Conclusion

Article 32 is a cornerstone of the Indian Constitution that upholds the rights of citizens and maintains the rule of law. It ensures that justice is accessible to all and that fundamental rights remain protected. While it has some limitations, its role in safeguarding democracy and individual freedoms cannot be overstated. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar rightly pointed out, without Article 32, fundamental rights would be meaningless. Hence, it remains an essential part of India's legal and constitutional framework.