Article 198 of Indian Constitution Explained in Detail — Speaker's Casting Vote, Voting Procedure & State Legislature Powers
The Constitution of India is the longest written constitution in the world, and every single article in it serves a unique and vital purpose. One such important provision is Article 198, which deals with voting in the Houses of State Legislature, the power of Houses to act despite vacancies, and the quorum requirements. At the heart of this article lies a fascinating concept — the Speaker's casting vote when there is an equality of votes.
If you are a law student, judicial services aspirant, or simply someone who wants to understand how decisions are made in your state legislature, this detailed guide will walk you through every aspect of Article 198. We will break down the legal language into simple words, compare it with Article 100 (the Parliament equivalent), look at real-world examples, and explore how this provision ensures fairness and continuity in the legislative process.
Before we dive deep, here is a quick overview of what Article 198 covers:
- Voting procedure in the State Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council
- Speaker's casting vote in case of a tie (equality of votes)
- Power to continue proceedings even if some seats are vacant
- Quorum rules — how many members must be present for a valid meeting
What is Article 198 of the Indian Constitution?
Article 198 falls under Part VI of the Indian Constitution, which deals with the States. Specifically, it is located in Chapter III titled "The State Legislature." This article is the state-level counterpart of Article 100, which governs voting in the Parliament of India (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha).
The article ensures that the business of the state legislature runs smoothly without unnecessary interruptions. It answers critical questions like: What happens when votes are tied? Can the House function if some members have resigned or passed away? How many members need to be present for a meeting to be valid?
Article 198 — Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum
(1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of a House of the Legislature of a State shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or Chairman, or person acting as such. The Speaker or Chairman, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) A House of the Legislature of a State shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of a House of the Legislature of a State shall be ten members or one-tenth of the total number of members of the House, whichever is greater.
(4) If at any time during a meeting of the Legislative Assembly or the Legislative Council of a State there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Speaker or Chairman, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.
Clause-by-Clause Breakdown of Article 198
Let us now dissect each clause of Article 198 one by one. Understanding each part separately will help you grasp the full picture and also prepare better for competitive exams like UPSC, State PCS, and Judicial Services.
Clause (1) — The Speaker's Casting Vote
This is the most important clause of Article 198 and the one that is most frequently asked about in exams. It has two parts:
Part A: All questions in the House are decided by a majority of votes of members who are present and voting. The Speaker (or Chairman, in case of Legislative Council) does NOT vote in the first instance. This means the Speaker remains neutral during normal voting.
Part B: However, if the votes are tied — meaning the number of "Ayes" equals the number of "Noes" — the Speaker gets a casting vote to break the tie. This is called the casting vote because it is cast only to resolve a deadlock.
Key Point: The Speaker does not have a regular vote like other members. They only vote when there is an equality of votes. This ensures the Speaker remains impartial and non-partisan while conducting the House.
Clause (2) — Power to Act Despite Vacancies
This clause is about continuity. It says that the House can continue to function and make decisions even if some seats are vacant. For example, if some MLAs resign, die, or are disqualified, the remaining members can still conduct business.
It also protects the validity of proceedings. Even if it is later discovered that someone who was not entitled to sit or vote participated in the proceedings, those proceedings remain valid. This prevents chaos and litigation over past decisions.
Clause (3) — Quorum Requirements
Quorum means the minimum number of members that must be present for a meeting to be valid. Article 198 sets the default quorum as:
- Ten members, OR
- One-tenth of the total members of the House
Whichever is greater. However, the state legislature can pass a law to change this number if needed.
Clause (4) — Duty of Speaker When No Quorum
If during a meeting it is found that there is no quorum (not enough members present), the Speaker has a duty to either:
- Adjourn the House (end the meeting), OR
- Suspend the meeting until enough members arrive
Comparison: Article 198 vs Article 100 of the Indian Constitution
Since Article 198 is the state-level version of Article 100, it is important to understand the similarities and differences. Here is a detailed comparison table:
| Aspect | Article 100 (Parliament) | Article 198 (State Legislature) |
|---|---|---|
| Applies To | Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha | State Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council |
| Presiding Officer | Speaker (Lok Sabha) / Chairman (Rajya Sabha) | Speaker (Assembly) / Chairman (Council) |
| Casting Vote | Speaker/Chairman votes only in case of equality of votes | Same provision — casting vote only in tie situation |
| First Instance Vote | Speaker does not vote in first instance | Speaker does not vote in first instance |
| Vacancies | House can act despite vacancies | House can act despite vacancies |
| Validity of Proceedings | Proceedings valid even if unqualified person participated | Same protection for state legislature proceedings |
| Quorum (Default) | One-tenth of total members of the House | Ten members OR one-tenth of total members, whichever is greater |
| Quorum Can Be Changed | Yes, by Parliament by law | Yes, by State Legislature by law |
| No Quorum Action | Speaker/Chairman must adjourn or suspend | Speaker/Chairman must adjourn or suspend |
| Part of Constitution | Part V (The Union) | Part VI (The States) |
Important Observation: The only major difference between Article 100 and Article 198 is the quorum calculation. For Parliament, it is simply one-tenth of total members. For State Legislature, it is ten members OR one-tenth, whichever is greater. This ensures that even small state legislatures have a reasonable minimum attendance requirement.
The Speaker's Casting Vote: A Deep Dive
The concept of the casting vote is one of the most interesting features of parliamentary democracy. Let us understand it in detail.
Why Does the Speaker Not Vote in the First Instance?
The Speaker is the neutral referee of the House. Their job is to ensure fair debate, maintain discipline, and interpret rules. If the Speaker regularly voted on every issue, they would be seen as taking sides, which would undermine their authority and impartiality.
By not voting in the first instance, the Speaker:
- Maintains political neutrality
- Preserves the dignity of the Chair
- Ensures fair conduct of House proceedings
- Avoids partisan bias in decision-making
When Does the Speaker Exercise the Casting Vote?
The casting vote is exercised only when:
- A division (formal vote) has been called
- The votes for and against are exactly equal in number
- The Speaker must then cast one vote to break the tie
How Is the Casting Vote Exercised?
The process is as follows:
- The Speaker asks the House to divide into "Ayes" and "Noes"
- The votes are counted by the tellers
- If the numbers are equal, the Speaker announces the tie
- The Speaker then casts their vote, declaring "Aye" or "No"
- The Speaker may give reasons for their decision, though this is not mandatory
Convention vs. Law
While the Constitution gives the Speaker the legal right to cast a vote, there are unwritten conventions that guide how this vote should be used. These conventions have developed over centuries of parliamentary practice, originally borrowed from the British House of Commons:
- Status Quo Convention: The Speaker generally votes to maintain the status quo — meaning they vote in a way that does not make a sudden or dramatic change.
- Further Discussion Convention: Whenever possible, the Speaker votes to keep the matter open for future discussion rather than closing it permanently.
- No Permanent Change: The Speaker avoids voting in a way that creates an irreversible decision when the House is evenly divided.
Real-World Example: In the UK House of Commons, Speaker John Bercow cast a casting vote in 2019 on a Brexit-related motion. He voted against the government, citing the convention that the Speaker should not allow a major policy change on a tied vote. While this was controversial, it demonstrated how the casting vote can have enormous political significance.
Table: Conventions Governing the Speaker's Casting Vote
| Convention | Description | Practical Application |
|---|---|---|
| Status Quo | Vote to maintain existing situation | If a bill is being amended, vote to keep the bill in its current form |
| Further Discussion | Vote to keep the issue open for debate | Vote against closure motions to allow more discussion |
| No Permanent Change | Avoid irreversible decisions on tied votes | Vote against constitutional amendments or major policy shifts |
| Impartiality | Do not favor any political party | Ignore party whip and vote based on House traditions |
| Transparency | Give reasons when casting vote | Speaker may explain the rationale in the House records |
Important Exception: Article 181 and Article 96
There is a crucial exception to the casting vote rule that you must know about. When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker is under consideration, the Speaker's voting rights change.
Under Article 181 (for State Legislature) and Article 96 (for Parliament):
- The Speaker shall not preside over the sitting while their removal resolution is being discussed
- The Speaker has the right to speak and defend themselves in the House
- The Speaker can vote in the first instance on the removal resolution
- However, the Speaker shall NOT have a casting vote in case of equality of votes on their removal
Why This Exception? This is a safeguard to prevent the Speaker from using their casting vote to save themselves from removal. It ensures that the House has the final say on the Speaker's tenure without the Speaker being able to break a tie in their own favor.
Quorum Requirements Across Indian State Legislatures
Let us look at how quorum works in practice. The default rule under Article 198 is ten members or one-tenth of the total, whichever is greater. Here are some examples:
| State | Assembly Strength | One-Tenth | Applicable Quorum (Greater of 10 or 1/10th) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uttar Pradesh | 403 | 40.3 = 41 | 41 members |
| Maharashtra | 288 | 28.8 = 29 | 29 members |
| Bihar | 243 | 24.3 = 25 | 25 members |
| Tamil Nadu | 234 | 23.4 = 24 | 24 members |
| Karnataka | 224 | 22.4 = 23 | 23 members |
| Gujarat | 182 | 18.2 = 19 | 19 members |
| Kerala | 140 | 14 | 14 members |
| Punjab | 117 | 11.7 = 12 | 12 members |
| Himachal Pradesh | 68 | 6.8 = 7 | 10 members (since 10 > 7) |
| Goa | 40 | 4 | 10 members (since 10 > 4) |
| Sikkim | 32 | 3.2 = 4 | 10 members (since 10 > 4) |
Key Insight: For smaller states like Goa and Sikkim, the minimum quorum is 10 members because that is greater than one-tenth of their total strength. This ensures that even small legislatures cannot function with just 3-4 members present, maintaining the dignity of the House.
Real-World Case Studies and Historical Instances
While casting votes are relatively rare in India compared to countries like the UK, there have been notable instances where the Speaker's vote played a decisive role. Let us look at some examples:
Case Study 1: The Confidence Vote Scenario
Imagine a state assembly with 200 members. After some resignations and disqualifications, the ruling party has 98 members and the opposition has 98 members. There are 4 independents. During a confidence motion, the ruling party gets 98 votes, the opposition gets 98 votes, and the independents abstain. The result is a tie at 98-98.
In this situation:
- The Speaker, who did not vote initially, now has the power to cast a casting vote
- If the Speaker votes with the government, the motion passes 99-98
- If the Speaker votes with the opposition, the motion fails 98-99
This is why the Speaker's role becomes politically crucial in hung assemblies.
Case Study 2: The UK Precedent — Speaker Bercow (2019)
In January 2019, UK Speaker John Bercow cast a casting vote on a government motion. The vote was tied at 311-311. Bercow voted against the government, citing the convention that the Speaker should not allow a major policy change on a tied vote. This decision had significant implications for the Brexit process and demonstrated the enormous power vested in the Speaker's casting vote.
Case Study 3: Australian Parliament — Speaker Andrew (2000)
In November 2000, the Australian House of Representatives saw an equality of votes on a motion of dissent from a Speaker's ruling. Speaker Neil Andrew declined to give a casting vote, stating that the matter had not been supported by a majority and he was not prepared to vote. He then put the question again, showing that Speakers sometimes use their discretion in unexpected ways.
Table: When Can the Speaker Vote? A Complete Guide
| Situation | Can Speaker Vote in First Instance? | Can Speaker Cast Vote in Tie? | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal Legislative Business | No | Yes | Article 198(1) |
| Removal of Speaker Resolution | Yes | No | Article 181(2) |
| Removal of Deputy Speaker | Yes (if Deputy Speaker) | No | Article 181(2) |
| Election of Speaker | Yes | N/A | Article 175 |
| Joint Sitting of Both Houses | No | Yes | Article 198 read with Article 196 |
| Money Bill Dispute | No | Yes | Article 198(1) |
| Constitutional Amendment | No | Yes | Article 198(1) |
Article 198 in Hung Assemblies: Why It Matters
In recent years, India has seen several hung assemblies where no single party has a clear majority. In such situations, Article 198 becomes extremely important because:
- The Speaker's casting vote can decide the fate of the government
- It can determine whether a confidence motion passes or fails
- It can influence the passage of critical legislation
- It can affect money bills and budget approvals
Let us understand this with a hypothetical scenario:
Scenario: A state has an assembly of 200 members. After elections, Party A has 95 seats, Party B has 95 seats, and independents have 10 seats. Party A forms the government with support from 6 independents, giving them 101 members. However, 2 independents later withdraw support. Now Party A has 99 members, Party B has 95, and 6 members are neutral. During a no-confidence motion, Party A gets 99 votes, Party B gets 99 votes. The Speaker must cast a casting vote. This single vote decides whether the government survives or falls.
This is why the election of the Speaker itself becomes a major political event in hung assemblies. The party that gets its candidate elected as Speaker effectively gains an extra vote in critical situations.
Table: Related Constitutional Provisions You Should Know
| Article | Subject Matter | Connection to Article 198 |
|---|---|---|
| Article 93 | Speaker and Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha | Parliamentary counterpart of state Speaker |
| Article 94 | Vacation and resignation of Speaker | Determines when Speaker's office is vacant |
| Article 95 | Deputy Speaker or person appointed to act as Speaker | Acting Speaker also has casting vote powers |
| Article 96 | Speaker not to preside during removal resolution | Exception to casting vote rule |
| Article 100 | Voting in Parliament | Parliamentary equivalent of Article 198 |
| Article 175 | Speaker of Legislative Assembly | Election and role of state Speaker |
| Article 178 | Speaker and Deputy Speaker of Legislative Assembly | State-level Speaker provisions |
| Article 179 | Vacation and resignation of office | When state Speaker's office becomes vacant |
| Article 180 | Deputy Speaker to act as Speaker | Acting Speaker provisions at state level |
| Article 181 | Speaker not to preside during removal resolution | State-level exception to casting vote |
| Article 196 | Provisions as to introduction and passing of Bills | Voting on bills where Article 198 applies |
| Article 199 | Definition of "Money Bill" | Money bills require Speaker's certification |
| Article 200 | Assent to Bills | After passing via Article 198 procedure |
| Article 208 | Rules of procedure | State legislature can make rules for voting |
Article 198 for Competitive Exams: Important MCQs and Concepts
If you are preparing for UPSC, State PCS, Judicial Services, or law entrance exams, here are the key concepts and likely questions about Article 198:
Frequently Asked Questions
- Q: Which article gives the Speaker a casting vote in case of equality of votes in State Legislature?
Ans: Article 198(1) - Q: Does the Speaker vote in the first instance under Article 198?
Ans: No, the Speaker does not vote in the first instance. - Q: What is the default quorum for a State Legislative Assembly?
Ans: Ten members or one-tenth of total members, whichever is greater. - Q: Can the State Legislature change the quorum requirement?
Ans: Yes, by passing a law under Article 198(3). - Q: What happens if there is no quorum during a meeting?
Ans: The Speaker must adjourn or suspend the meeting. - Q: Is a proceeding valid if an unqualified person participated?
Ans: Yes, under Article 198(2), proceedings remain valid. - Q: Can the Speaker cast a vote during their own removal proceedings?
Ans: The Speaker can vote in the first instance but NOT cast a vote in case of tie during removal proceedings (Article 181). - Q: Which article is the parliamentary counterpart of Article 198?
Ans: Article 100.
Key Differences to Remember
- Article 100 applies to Parliament; Article 198 applies to State Legislature
- Parliament quorum is one-tenth only; State quorum is ten OR one-tenth, whichever is greater
- Both articles give the same casting vote power to the presiding officer
- Both protect proceedings from being invalidated due to vacancies or disqualifications
Critical Analysis: Strengths and Criticisms of Article 198
Like every constitutional provision, Article 198 has its strengths as well as areas where criticism has been raised. Let us examine both sides:
Strengths of Article 198
- Ensures Continuity: The House can function even with vacancies, preventing governance paralysis
- Maintains Impartiality: By restricting the Speaker's vote to tie-breaking only, the provision preserves the Speaker's neutral role
- Prevents Deadlock: The casting vote ensures that legislative business does not get stuck in case of equal division
- Protects Past Proceedings: The validity clause prevents frivolous challenges to past legislative actions
- Flexible Quorum: States can adjust quorum requirements based on their specific needs
Criticisms and Concerns
- Political Bias: In practice, Speakers often belong to the ruling party, raising concerns about partisan use of the casting vote
- Conventions Not Codified: The conventions guiding the casting vote are unwritten, leading to uncertainty
- Hung Assembly Manipulation: The provision can be exploited in hung assemblies to keep weak governments in power
- No Judicial Review: There is limited scope for courts to review how the Speaker exercises the casting vote
- Speaker's Dilemma: The Speaker faces a moral dilemma when their casting vote could topple or save a government
Expert Opinion: Many constitutional experts believe that while Article 198 is necessary for legislative functioning, there should be clearer codified guidelines on how the casting vote should be exercised. Some have suggested that the Speaker should be required to give written reasons for their casting vote, which would be recorded in the official proceedings.
Comparative Analysis: Casting Vote in Other Democracies
The concept of the casting vote is not unique to India. It exists in several other democracies, though the rules vary. Here is a comparison:
| Country | Presiding Officer | Casting Vote Rule | Special Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | Speaker of Lok Sabha / State Assembly | Only in case of equality; no first instance vote | No vote during own removal (Articles 96, 181) |
| United Kingdom | Speaker of House of Commons | Only in tie; conventions guide usage | Strong tradition of impartiality; Speaker resigns from party |
| Australia | Speaker of House of Representatives | Only in tie; conventions apply | Speaker may give reasons recorded in Votes and Proceedings |
| Canada | Speaker of House of Commons | Only in tie; maintains status quo | Speaker expected to vote to continue debate |
| United States | Vice President (Senate) / Speaker (House) | Vice President can break ties in Senate | US Speaker votes regularly like other members |
| New Zealand | Speaker of House of Representatives | Only in tie; follows UK conventions | Speaker expected to vote for status quo |
Interesting Fact: In the United States, the Vice President serves as the President of the Senate and can cast tie-breaking votes. This has happened hundreds of times in US history. Unlike India, where the Speaker is expected to be non-partisan, the US Vice President is openly political, making their tie-breaking votes highly partisan.
How Article 198 Works in Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Let us walk through a typical legislative scenario where Article 198 comes into play:
Step 1: Motion is Introduced
A member introduces a motion or a bill is put to vote. The Speaker presides over the proceedings and ensures proper debate.
Step 2: Division is Called
If the Speaker cannot determine the result by voice vote ("Ayes" and "Noes"), a division is called. Members physically move to the "Ayes" lobby or the "Noes" lobby, or an electronic voting system is used.
Step 3: Votes Are Counted
The tellers count the votes. The Speaker does not participate in this counting and does not cast a vote at this stage.
Step 4: Result is Announced
The Speaker announces the result. If one side has more votes, the motion passes or fails accordingly. The Speaker's role ends here in normal cases.
Step 5: Tie Situation — Casting Vote
If the votes are exactly equal, the Speaker announces a tie. The Speaker then exercises their casting vote under Article 198(1) to break the deadlock.
Step 6: Final Result
The Speaker's vote is added to one side, and the final result is announced. The decision is recorded in the official proceedings of the House.
Related Articles and Resources on Barristery.in
At Barristery.in, we are dedicated to making Indian constitutional law accessible to everyone. If you enjoyed this deep dive into Article 198, you will definitely find these resources helpful:
- Biswanath Singh Institute of Legal Studies, Munger — Complete Guide for Law Aspirants — Planning to study law? This comprehensive guide covers one of Bihar's emerging law colleges with details on admissions, fees, and career opportunities.
- Legal Careers Portal — LL.B Jobs, Internships & Moot Court Competitions — Your daily updated source for legal job alerts, internship opportunities, moot court competitions, essay competitions, and calls for blogs from top law firms and legal organizations across India.
- About Barristery.in — Your Legal Knowledge Partner — Learn about our mission to simplify Indian law for students, professionals, and citizens. Founded by Rabi Kumar Pandit, a legal professional with expertise in History, Economics, and Law from the University of Calcutta.
Stay Connected: Bookmark Barristery.in for regular updates on constitutional law, legal career guidance, exam preparation tips, and the latest government job notifications for law graduates.
Conclusion: The Silent Guardian of Legislative Democracy
Article 198 may seem like a dry procedural provision at first glance, but it is actually one of the cornerstones of legislative democracy in Indian states. By giving the Speaker a casting vote only in cases of tie, it preserves the Speaker's impartiality while ensuring that legislative deadlocks can be broken. By allowing the House to function despite vacancies, it ensures continuity of governance. By setting quorum requirements, it maintains the dignity and seriousness of legislative proceedings.
Whether you are a law student preparing for exams, a civil services aspirant studying the Constitution, or a curious citizen wanting to understand how your state legislature works, Article 198 is a provision worth knowing deeply. It reminds us that democracy is not just about big speeches and election rallies — it is also about the carefully designed rules that ensure our legislatures function fairly, smoothly, and without interruption.
The next time you hear about a hung assembly or a tied vote in the news, you will know exactly what constitutional provision is at play and why the Speaker's role becomes so crucial. Article 198 is the silent guardian that keeps the wheels of state democracy turning, one vote at a time.
Did You Find This Article Helpful? Share it with your friends preparing for judicial services, UPSC, or law exams. For more detailed constitutional analysis, exam tips, and legal career guidance, keep visiting Barristery.in — India's trusted legal knowledge platform.
Last Updated: July 2026 | Article Published on Barristery.in
COMMENTS